Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346907›Full record

ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2022

Prognostic Value of Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age-Adjusted Derivatives in Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Persian Registry of Cardiovascular Disease/ Heart Failure Study.

Niloofar Bondariyan, Mehrbod Vakhshoori, Niyousha Sadeghpour, Davood Shafie

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06415006 (Can Shock Indices Be Prognostic Indicators in Sepsis/Septic Shock?), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06415006 completednot on this map

Can Shock Indices Be Prognostic Indicators in Sepsis/Septic Shock?

TypeobservationalSponsorBaşakşehir Çam & Sakura City HospitalRan2012 to 2024Enrolled1,522ConditionsShock, Septic, Hemodynamic InstabilityArmsMeasurement of hemodynamic parameters.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niloofar BondariyanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mehrbod VakhshooriHeart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Niyousha SadeghpourHeart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Davood ShafieHeart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntroduction of simple bedside tools for assessing patients' condition in different settings improves triaging. However, these indices are less frequently used in heart failure. This study aims to evaluate the utility of shock index, age shock index, modified shock index, and age-modified shock index in the prediction of in-hospital mortality in acute decompensated heart failure individuals.

methodsWe conducted this retrospective study on 3652 acute decompensated heart failure individuals in the context of Persian Registry of Cardiovascular Disease/heart failure. Shock index, age shock index, modified shock index, and age-modified shock index were assessed during admission. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to define the optimum cut-off point. Odds ratio models were used for investigating the association of in-hospital mortality according to each specified cut-off value.

resultsMean age was 70.12 ± 12.56 years (males: 62.6%). Optimum cut-off point for shock index, age shock index, modified shock index, and age-modified shock index were set to be 0.71 (sensitivity: 63%, specificity: 60%), 50.5 (sensitivity: 65%, specificity: 60%), 0.94 (sensitivity: 60%, specificity: 60%), and 66.7 (sensitivity: 62%, specificity: 60%), respectively. Participants with higher shock index derivatives in all domains had significantly higher likelihood of death. Compared to those with shock index, age shock index, modified shock index, and age-modified shock index values of less than cut-off points, adjusted model revealed patients with higher values had 2.59 (95% CI: 1.94-3.46, P<.001), 2.61 (95% CI: 1.95-3.48, P <.001), 2.14 (95% CI: 1.61-2.84, P <.001), and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.72- 3.03, P <.001) times increase in-hospital death risk, respectively.

conclusionsShock index, age shock index, modified shock index, and age-modified shock index are simple bedside tools to reliably predict in-hospital mortality in acute decompensated heart failure patients to better prioritize high-risk subjects.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHeart FailureAgedAged, 80 and overHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRegistriesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35346907
PMCPMC9366448
OpenAlexW4221020533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.