Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346901›Full record

SynthesisAnatolian journal of cardiology2022

Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Combined with Left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

An Wang, Jingbo Jiang, Zhitao Xie, Guoqiang Zhong

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of fibrosis regionality on atrial fibrillation recurrence: insights from DECAAF II.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Efficacy and safety of concomitant catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure compared to catheter ablation only - a meta-analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

An WangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Jingbo JiangDepartment of Cardiology, Guilin People's Hospital, Guilin, China.
Zhitao XieDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Guoqiang ZhongDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure is effective in treating atrial fibrillation. However, the effectiveness of this combined treatment compared with catheter ablation alone is still controversial.

methodsWe searched studies in databases, including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, that compared catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure and catheter ablation alone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. These studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: the freedom from atrial arrhythmia rate, the procedure time, the fluoroscopy time, perioperative complications, thromboembolic events, and bleeding events during follow-up. The risk ratio and standard mean difference with 95% CI were analyzed by the random-effects model.

resultsFive studies involving 699 people were included in our meta-analysis. We found no significant difference in the freedom from atrial arrhythmia rate (risk ratio=0.93, 95% CI=0.83-1.04, I 2=0%, P=.21) between the 2 groups. Catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure showed significantly longer procedure and fluoroscopy times than catheter ablation alone (standard mean difference=1.26, 95% CI=0.85-1.67, P <.00001 and standard mean difference=1.19, 95% CI=0.53-1.85, P=.0004, respectively). With regard to safety outcomes, no significant differences were observed in perioperative complications (RR=1.62, 95% CI=0.99-2.63, I 2=0%, P=.05), thromboembolic events (RR=0.67, 95% CI=0.15-3.11, I 2=0%, P=.61), or bleeding events (RR=0.67, 95% CI=0.11-3.88, P=.65) between the 2 groups during follow-up.

conclusionThe freedom from atrial arrhythmia rate and safety outcomes of catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure are similar to those of catheter ablation alone. Catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure appears to have longer procedure and fluoroscopy times than catheter ablation alone.

Indexed as

Atrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationCardiac Surgical ProceduresCatheter AblationThromboembolismHumans

Identifiers

PMID35346901
PMCPMC9372482
OpenAlexW4220811984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.