Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346764›Full record

ArticleAppetite2022

A content analysis of sports and energy drink advertising.

Amy Bleakley, Morgan E Ellithorpe, Amy B Jordan, Michael Hennessy, Robin Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy BleakleyDepartment of Communication, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA. Electronic address: bleakley@udel.edu.
Morgan E EllithorpeDepartment of Communication, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Amy B JordanSchool of Communication and Information, Department of Journalism and Media Studies, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, 4 Huntington Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Michael HennessyDepartment of Communication, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Robin StevensAnnenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California, 3502 Watt Way, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.

Funding

NIDCR/NIH: R21 Misleading messages, Ambivalent attitudes: Teen beliefs about sports drinksR21DE028414 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BLEAKLEY, AMY · 2019 to 2020
$504k
NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE028414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study identifies constructs from key persuasion theories that are present in popular sports and energy drink advertising. A theory-driven content analysis was conducted on 315 popular television and social media sports and energy drink advertisements from top selling brands. The advertisements were analyzed for the presence of persuasive cues as per the Elaboration Likelihood Model (e.g, onscreen consumption, presence of celebrities) as well as Reasoned Action behavioral expectancies and normative beliefs Approach related to consumption. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Differences between sports and energy drinks were assessed and reliability statistics for all codes were calculated. Advertisements relied on peripheral cues like sports and celebrities that were not related to the drinks themselves. Theory-relevant beliefs about improved athletic performance and consumption of the drinks onscreen were common. Sports drinks were more likely to focus on mainstream sports; energy drinks featured extreme sports, and energy drink advertisements promoted the drinks for use beyond sports (e.g., work settings). The cues and beliefs identified in these ads help to clarify the role of advertising in beliefs about sports drinks being healthy and energy drinks being helpful to achieve goals. Future research is needed that links exposure to coded advertisement features to adolescents' beliefs about sports and energy drinks.

Indexed as

Energy DrinksSportsAdolescentAdvertisingBeveragesHumansReproducibility of ResultsTelevisionAdvertisementsContent analysisEnergy drinksMarketingSports drinksSugar sweetened beverages

Identifiers

PMID35346764
PMCPMC9058213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.