Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346650›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2022

Examining the context benefit in older adults: A combined behavioral-electrophysiologic word identification study.

Rebecca E Bieber, Christian Brodbeck, Samira Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca E BieberDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, 0100 Lefrak Hall, University of Maryland College Park, College Park MD, 20740, USA. Electronic address: rbieber@umd.edu.
Christian BrodbeckDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs CT, 06269, USA.
Samira AndersonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, 0100 Lefrak Hall, University of Maryland College Park, College Park MD, 20740, USA.

Funding

COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF HEARINGT32DC000046 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Catherine Emily Carr, Matthew J. Goupell · 1994 to 2026
$7.5M
Linkage/Positional Cloning In Communication DisordersZ01DC000046 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI DRAYNA, DENNIS · 1998 to 2008
$3.3M
Age-related changes in neural encoding and perception of temporal speech cuesR21DC015843 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI ANDERSON, SAMIRA B · 2016 to 2018
$436k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DC000046NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015843NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When listening to degraded speech, listeners can use high-level semantic information to support recognition. The literature contains conflicting findings regarding older listeners' ability to benefit from semantic cues in recognizing speech, relative to younger listeners. Electrophysiologic (EEG) measures of lexical access (N400) often show that semantic context does not facilitate lexical access in older listeners; in contrast, auditory behavioral studies indicate that semantic context improves speech recognition in older listeners as much as or more than in younger listeners. Many behavioral studies of aging and the context benefit have employed signal degradation or alteration, whereas this stimulus manipulation has been absent in the EEG literature, a possible reason for the inconsistencies between studies. Here we compared the context benefit as a function of age and signal type, using EEG combined with behavioral measures. Non-native accent, a common form of signal alteration which many older adults report as a challenge in daily speech recognition, was utilized for testing. The stimuli included English sentences produced by native speakers of English and Spanish, containing target words differing in cloze probability. Listeners performed a word identification task while 32-channel cortical responses were recorded. Results show that older adults' word identification performance was poorer in the low-predictability and non-native talker conditions than the younger adults', replicating earlier behavioral findings. However, older adults did not show reduction or delay in the average N400 response as compared to younger listeners, suggesting no age-related reduction in predictive processing capability. Potential sources for discrepancies in the prior literature are discussed.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionAgedElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansLanguageMaleSemanticsAgingContextNon-native speechSpeech recognition

Identifiers

PMID35346650
PMCPMC9087202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.