Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346497›Full record

ReviewPoultry science2022

Communicating the utility of the microbiome and bioinformatics to small flock poultry producers.

Steven C Ricke, Dana K Dittoe, Ashley A Tarcin, Michael J Rothrock

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Poultry science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven C RickeMeat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Electronic address: sricke@wisc.edu.
Dana K DittoeMeat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Ashley A TarcinMeat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Michael J RothrockUSDA-ARS, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Egg Safety & Quality Research Unit, Athens, GA 30605, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USQuality Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of "omics" has become widespread across poultry production, from breeding to management to bird health to food safety and everywhere in between.  While the conventional poultry industry has become more exposed to the power and utility of "omic" technologies, smaller poultry flock producers typically do not have this same level of experience. Because smaller, nonconventional poultry production is a growing portion of the overall poultry market, it is important that they also have educational access to these research tools and the resultant data. While small flock producers are dedicated and knowledgeable farmers, their knowledge of these newer technologies may be limited at best, and it is the task of academic researchers to communicate the importance of these "omic" tools and how the omic data can improve a variety of different aspects of their operations. This review discusses ways to effectively communicate complex microbiota and microbial genome sequence data to small flock producers and transforming this data into meaningful and applicable information that they can utilize to inform beneficial management decisions.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPoultryAnimal HusbandryAnimalsChickensComputational BiologyFarmersHumansbioinformaticseducationmicrobiomeomicssmall poultry growers

Identifiers

PMID35346497
PMCPMC9079341
OpenAlexW4212906052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.