Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346494›Full record

ReviewPoultry science2022

Application of microbial analyses to feeds and potential implications for poultry nutrition.

Elena G Olson, Dana K Dittoe, Joshua A Jendza, David A Stock, Steven C Ricke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Poultry science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elena G OlsonMeat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Dana K DittoeMeat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Joshua A JendzaBASF Corporation, 100 Park Avenue, Florham Park, NJ 07932, USA.
David A StockBiology Department, Stetson University, Deland, FL 32723, USA.
Steven C RickeMeat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Electronic address: sricke@wisc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry nutrition and feed manufacturing are interrelated for a variety of reasons. Diet formulation is essential for optimizing bird growth and feed conversion, but compositional differences and the presence of certain feed additives can alter the gastrointestinal microbial composition and functionality. Not only does dietary composition and digestibility influence poultry performance, but specific physical characteristics such as feed particle size and thermal treatments can impact the avian gastrointestinal tract (GIT) microbiota. Poultry feeds also have a characteristic microbial ecology consisting of pathogenic and nonpathogenic microorganisms. Some feed-borne pathogens such as Salmonella are well studied and linked with the colonization of birds consuming the feed. However, much less is known about the nonpathogenic feed microbiome and what impact that might have on the bird's GIT. This review discusses the potential interaction between poultry feed and the GIT microbiome, microbial ecology of feed, application of microbiome analyses to feed, and approaches for communicating these complex data sets to the poultry industry.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimal FeedAnimalsChickensGastrointestinal TractPoultryfeedmicrobial ecologymicrobiomenutritionpoultry

Identifiers

PMID35346494
PMCPMC9079344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.