Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346493›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2022

Practical opportunities for microbiome analyses and bioinformatics in poultry processing.

Steven C Ricke, Dana K Dittoe, Jessica A Brown, Dale R Thompson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven C RickeMeat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Electronic address: sricke@wisc.edu.
Dana K DittoeMeat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Jessica A BrownMeat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Dale R ThompsonDepartment of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry processing is undergoing changes both in operations as well as microbial methodologies. Traditionally, microbial data has been gathered through a series of culturing methods using liquid media and plating for isolation and enumeration. Both foodborne pathogens and nonpathogenic bacterial populations are estimated to assess food safety risks as well as the potential for spoilage. Bacterial loads from carcasses are important for estimating processing control and the effectiveness of antimicrobial applications. However, these culture-based approaches may only provide part of the microbial ecology landscape associated with chicken carcasses and the subsequent changes that occur in these populations during processing. Newer molecular-based approaches, such as 16S sequencing of the microbiota, offer a means to retrieve a more comprehensive microbial compositional profile. However, such approaches also result in large data sets which must be analyzed and interpreted. As more data is generated, this will require not only bioinformatic programs to process the data but appropriate educational forums to present the processed data to a broad audience.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPoultryAnimalsChickensComputational BiologyFood Microbiologybioinformaticseducationmicrobiomemicrobiotapoultry processing

Identifiers

PMID35346493
PMCPMC9079351
OpenAlexW4213132455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.