Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346327›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

SHOOT: phylogenetic gene search and ortholog inference.

David Mark Emms, Steven Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout of Shell Matrix Protein 1 in the Slipper-Snail Crepidula atrasolea.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David Mark EmmsDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK. davidmemms@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9065-8978
Steven KellyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK. steven.kelly@plants.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8583-5362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the evolutionary relationships between genes is fundamental to comparative biological research. Here, we present SHOOT. SHOOT searches a user query sequence against a database of phylogenetic trees and returns a tree with the query sequence correctly placed within it. We show that SHOOT performs this analysis with comparable speed to a BLAST search. We demonstrate that SHOOT phylogenetic placements are as accurate as conventional tree inference, and it can identify orthologs with high accuracy. In summary, SHOOT is a fast and accurate tool for phylogenetic analyses of novel query sequences. It is available online at www.shoot.bio .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiological EvolutionPhylogenyOrthology inferencePhylogenetic tree inferenceSequence similarity search

Identifiers

PMID35346327
PMCPMC8962542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.