Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346299›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurodegeneration2022

Cerebrospinal fluid tau levels are associated with abnormal neuronal plasticity markers in Alzheimer's disease.

Pieter Jelle Visser, Lianne M Reus, Johan Gobom, Iris Jansen, Ellen Dicks, Sven J van der Lee, Magda Tsolaki, Frans R J Verhey, Julius Popp, Pablo Martinez-Lage and 20 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 17 institutions in 10 countries.

Pieter Jelle VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PO Box 7057 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pj.visser@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8008-9727
Lianne M ReusAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PO Box 7057 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan GobomClinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.
Iris JansenDepartment of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ellen DicksAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PO Box 7057 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sven J van der LeeAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PO Box 7057 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Magda Tsolaki1St Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Makedonia, Greece.
Frans R J VerheyAlzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Julius PoppOld Age Psychiatry, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pablo Martinez-LageFundación CITA-Alzhéimer Fundazioa, San Sebastian, Spain.
Rik VandenbergheNeurology Service, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Alberto LleóIIB-Sant Pau, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
José Luís MolinuevoBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Barcelona, Spain.
Sebastiaan EngelborghsReference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Yvonne Freund-LeviDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lutz FroelichDepartment of Geriatric Psychiatry, Zentralinstitut Für Seelische Gesundheit, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Kristel SleegersComplex Genetics Group, VIB Center for Molecular Neurology, VIB, Antwerp, Belgium.
Valerija DobricicLübeck Interdisciplinary Platform for Genome Analytics, Institutes of Neurogenetics and Cardiogenetics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Simon LovestoneJansen UK, High Wycombe, UK.
Johannes StrefferReference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Stephanie J B VosAlzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Isabelle BosAlzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
ADNI
August B SmitDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kaj BlennowClinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.
Philip ScheltensAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PO Box 7057 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charlotte E TeunissenNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (AUMC), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Netherlands.
Lars BertramLübeck Interdisciplinary Platform for Genome Analytics, Institutes of Neurogenetics and Cardiogenetics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Henrik ZetterbergClinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.
Betty M TijmsAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PO Box 7057 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Oslo · NOAHEPA University Hospital · GRFundacion CITA Alzheimer · ESHeidelberg University · DEHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESJanssen (United Kingdom) · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEKU Leuven · BEÖrebro University · SEUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Zurich · CHVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
CIHRNIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased total tau (t-tau) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a key characteristic of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is considered to result from neurodegeneration. T-tau levels, however, can be increased in very early disease stages, when neurodegeneration is limited, and can be normal in advanced disease stages. This suggests that t-tau levels may be driven by other mechanisms as well. Because tau pathophysiology is emerging as treatment target for AD, we aimed to clarify molecular processes associated with CSF t-tau levels.

methodsWe performed a proteomic, genomic, and imaging study in 1380 individuals with AD, in the preclinical, prodromal, and mild dementia stage, and 380 controls from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and EMIF-AD Multimodality Biomarker Discovery study.

resultsWe found that, relative to controls, AD individuals with increased t-tau had increased CSF concentrations of over 400 proteins enriched for neuronal plasticity processes. In contrast, AD individuals with normal t-tau had decreased levels of these plasticity proteins and showed increased concentrations of proteins indicative of blood-brain barrier and blood-CSF barrier dysfunction, relative to controls. The distinct proteomic profiles were already present in the preclinical AD stage and persisted in prodromal and dementia stages implying that they reflect disease traits rather than disease states. Dysregulated plasticity proteins were associated with SUZ12 and REST signaling, suggesting aberrant gene repression. GWAS analyses contrasting AD individuals with and without increased t-tau highlighted several genes involved in the regulation of gene expression. Targeted analyses of SNP rs9877502 in GMNC, associated with t-tau levels previously, correlated in individuals with AD with CSF concentrations of 591 plasticity associated proteins. The number of APOE-e4 alleles, however, was not associated with the concentration of plasticity related proteins.

conclusionsCSF t-tau levels in AD are associated with altered levels of proteins involved in neuronal plasticity and blood-brain and blood-CSF barrier dysfunction. Future trials may need to stratify on CSF t-tau status, as AD individuals with increased t-tau and normal t-tau are likely to respond differently to treatment, given their opposite CSF proteomic profiles.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseNeuronal Plasticitytau ProteinsBiomarkersHumansProteomicsBiomarkerstau ProteinsAlzheimer's diseaseBiomarker discoveryCerebrospinal fluid proteomicsHeterogeneityMolecular mechanismsNeuronal plasticity

Identifiers

PMID35346299
PMCPMC8962234
OpenAlexW4220710542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.