ArticleMolecular neurodegeneration2022
Culture shock: microglial heterogeneity, activation, and disrupted single-cell microglial networks in vitro.
Article in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recombinant CXCL16 reduces brain injury by modulating microglial phenotype and attenuating apoptosis in acute ischemic stroke.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microglia extract neuronal proteolytic organelles via skoupocytosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Reconstituting central nervous system niche cues partially restores homeostatic-like features in cultured murine primary microglia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A region-delineated snRNA-seq atlas of mouse spinal cord across lifespan resolves the interaction of normative aging programs with SOD1-G93A ALS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Exploring retinal microglia: development, degeneration, and iPSC-derived model systems.Brain structure & function · 2026Review
- Microglial heterogeneity: influence of human 2D, 3D, and co-culture models on gene expression and immune function.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
- Method for the simultaneous isolation of primary astrocytes and microglia from the neonatal rats cerebral cortex.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
- Photoreceptor outer segments promote the accumulation of lipid droplets in microglia by reprogramming lipid metabolism.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The Neurogenic Niche: Interactions Among Vessels, Glia, and Neural Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- A bioinformatic survey of RNA isoform diversity and expression across 9 GTEx tissues using long-read sequencing data.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Extracellular tau clearance is governed by its aggregation state and independent of microglial activation by LPS and IFN-γ.Neurobiology of disease · 2025Article
- Controlled Delivery of a Neurotrophic Factor in the Adult Mouse Brain Using Engineered Microglia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- HDAC inhibitors engage MITF and the disease-associated microglia signature to enhance amyloid β uptake.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2025Article
- Single-cell transcriptomics of neuroinflammation and cerebrovascular endothelial cells in the aged rat hippocampus.iScience · 2025Article
- Single-cell transcriptome combined with genetic tracing reveals a roadmap of fibrosis formation during proliferative vitreoretinopathy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- CSF1R-Dependent Microglial Repopulation and Contact-Dependent Inhibition of Proliferation In Vitro.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Targeting CX3CR1 Signaling Dynamics: A Critical Determinant in the Temporal Regulation of Post-Stroke Neurorepair.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Characterizing Microglial Signaling Dynamics During Inflammation Using Single-Cell Mass Cytometry.Glia · 2025Article
- Olfactory ensheathing cells from adult female rats are hybrid glia that promote neural repair.eLife · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicroglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, play a critical role in numerous diseases, but are a minority cell type and difficult to genetically manipulate in vivo with viral vectors and other approaches. Primary cultures allow a more controlled setting to investigate these cells, but morphological and transcriptional changes upon removal from their normal brain environment raise many caveats from in vitro studies.
methodsTo investigate whether cultured microglia recapitulate in vivo microglial signatures, we used single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) to compare microglia freshly isolated from the brain to primary microglial cultures. We performed cell population discovery, differential expression analysis, and gene co-expression module analysis to compare signatures between in vitro and in vivo microglia. We constructed causal predictive network models of transcriptional regulators from the scRNAseq data and identified a set of potential key drivers of the cultured phenotype. To validate this network analysis, we knocked down two of these key drivers, C1qc and Prdx1, in primary cultured microglia and quantified changes in microglial activation markers.
resultsWe found that, although often assumed to be a relatively homogenous population of cells in culture, in vitro microglia are a highly heterogeneous population consisting of distinct subpopulations of cells with transcriptional profiles reminiscent of macrophages and monocytes, and are marked by transcriptional programs active in neurodegeneration and other disease states. We found that microglia in vitro presented transcriptional activation of a set of "culture shock genes" not found in freshly isolated microglia, characterized by strong upregulation of disease-associated genes including Apoe, Lyz2, and Spp1, and downregulation of homeostatic microglial markers, including Cx3cr1, P2ry12, and Tmem119. Finally, we found that cultured microglia prominently alter their transcriptional machinery modulated by key drivers from the homeostatic to activated phenotype. Knockdown of one of these drivers, C1qc, resulted in downregulation of microglial activation genes Lpl, Lyz2, and Ccl4.
conclusionsOverall, our data suggest that when removed from their in vivo home environment, microglia suffer a severe case of "culture shock", drastically modulating their transcriptional regulatory network state from homeostatic to activated through upregulation of modules of culture-specific genes. Consequently, cultured microglia behave as a disparate cell type that does not recapitulate the homeostatic signatures of microglia in vivo. Finally, our predictive network model discovered potential key drivers that may convert activated microglia back to their homeostatic state, allowing for more accurate representation of in vivo states in culture. Knockdown of key driver C1qc partially attenuated microglial activation in vitro, despite C1qc being only weakly upregulated in culture. This suggests that even genes that are not strongly differentially expressed across treatments or preparations may drive downstream transcriptional changes in culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.