Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346274›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol.

Jin-Sung Kim, Jun Ho Lee, Junseok Bae, Dong Chan Lee, Sang-Ha Shin, Han Joong Keum, Young Soo Choi, Sang Soo Eun, Seung Ho Shin, Hyun Jin Hong and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Jin-Sung KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun Ho LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Junseok BaeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chungdam Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong Chan LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Ha ShinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chungdam Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Han Joong KeumDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chungdam Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Soo ChoiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chungdam Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Soo EunDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungdam Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Ho ShinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Jin HongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Ji Yeon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Tae Hyun KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Woojung LimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Junghoon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Min ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Jin ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Center, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hong-Jae LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 64 Daeheung-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, 301-723, Korea. kosailee73@gmail.com.
Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital · KRWooridul Hospital · KRCatholic University of Korea · KRHallym University · KRKyung Hee University Medical Center · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

Korea's Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HC20C0163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in minimally invasive surgery have expanded the indications for interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy. Although the clinical outcomes for this approach may be equivalent to those of conventional microscopic discectomy, the supporting evidence is still based on small, single-center, prospective, and retrospective studies. Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted.

methodsThis will be a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy to those of conventional microscopic discectomy. The trial will enroll 100 participants with a lumbar disc herniation, 50 in each group. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes will be back and leg pain (visual analog scale); the ODI; the EuroQol-5-dimension score; patient satisfaction; and walking distance/time and time to return to daily activities post-surgery. Surgical outcomes will include postoperative drainage, operative time, duration of hospital stay, postoperative creatine kinase level as an indicator of muscle injury, and postoperative scarring. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and simple radiography will be performed to evaluate radiographic outcomes between the two surgical approaches. Surgery-related complications and adverse effects will be evaluated as safety outcomes. A single assessor at each participating hospital, blinded to group allocation, will assess the enrolled participants at baseline, at 2 weeks, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to determine whether interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy is clinically comparable to microscopic discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations. All efforts will be made to reduce bias, including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and multicenter prospective registration. The outcomes will inform practice, providing the evidence needed for using interlaminar full-endoscopic over microscopic discectomy by confirming the potential of this technique to improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.

trial registrationClinical Research Information Service; cris.nih.go.kr. (KCT0006277); protocol version (v1, June 8, 2021).

Indexed as

Diskectomy, PercutaneousIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DisplacementDiskectomyEndoscopyHumansLumbar VertebraeMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeConventional microscopic discectomyInterlaminar full-endoscopic discectomyLumbar disc herniationMinimally invasive surgeryStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID35346274
PMCPMC8962468
OpenAlexW4225631513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.