Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346159›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Interprofessional communication in medical simulation: findings from a scoping review and implications for academic medicine.

Sadie Trammell Velásquez, Diane Ferguson, Kelly C Lemke, Leticia Bland, Rebecca Ajtai, Braulio Amezaga, James Cleveland, Lark A Ford, Emme Lopez, Wesley Richardson and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Scoping Review: The Effectiveness of Interprofessional Virtual Reality Simulation.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sadie Trammell VelásquezJoe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. trammellvela@uthscsa.edu.
Diane FergusonJoe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Kelly C LemkeSchool of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Leticia BlandSchool of Health Professions, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Rebecca AjtaiBriscoe Library, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Braulio AmezagaSchool of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
James ClevelandSchool of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Lark A FordSchool of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Emme LopezBriscoe Library, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Wesley RichardsonSchool of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Daniel SaenzGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Joseph A ZorekSchool of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterprofessional communication is fundamental to the delivery of healthcare and can be taught in medical school and other health professional schools through interprofessional education (IPE) activities. Simulation centers have become a predominant location for simulation IPE activities with infrastructure able to support high fidelity activities in a controlled environment. In this secondary analysis of a scoping review conducted on simulation-based IPE, we describe the characteristics of previously reported simulation IPE activities involving undergraduate medical students in a simulation center focused on interprofessional communication.

methodsElectronic searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and ERIC databases in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines were conducted to isolate relevant articles from 2016-2020. In total, 165 peer-reviewed articles met inclusion criteria and data extraction linked to four research questions was applied by one individual and the accuracy was confirmed by a second individual. A secondary analysis was performed to describe what existing approaches for simulation IPE in simulation center settings have been used to explicitly achieve interprofessional communication competencies in undergraduate medical education. A sub-dataset was developed from the original scoping review and identified 21 studies describing simulation IPE activities that took place in dedicated simulation centers, targeted the IPEC interprofessional communication domain, and involved undergraduate medical students.

resultsThough diverse, the majority of simulation IPE activities described high-fidelity approaches involving standardized patients and utilized assessment tools with established validity evidence in IPE activities to measure learning outcomes. A minority of simulation IPE activities were described as hybrid and utilized more than one resource or equipment for the activity and only two were longitudinal in nature. Learning outcomes were focused predominantly on modification of attitudes/perceptions and few targeted higher levels of assessment.

conclusionsEducators charged with developing simulation IPE activities for medical students focused on interprofessional communication should incorporate assessment tools that have validity evidence from similar activities, target higher level learning outcomes, and leverage hybrid models to develop longitudinal simulation IPE activities. Though an ideal environment to achieve higher level learning outcomes, simulation centers are not required for meaningful simulation IPE activities.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationComputer SimulationHealth PersonnelHumansInterprofessional communicationInterprofessional educationMedical educationSimulation

Identifiers

PMID35346159
PMCPMC8962252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.