Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346141›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2022

Risk factors for progression of Urolith Associated with Obstructive Urosepsis to severe sepsis or septic shock.

J D Cao, Z C Wang, Y L Wang, H C Li, C M Gu, Z G Bai, Z Q Chen, S S Wang, S T Xiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J D Cao *Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Fangcun Branch, 36 Chong'an Street, North Dongjiao Road, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Z C Wang *Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Fangcun Branch, 36 Chong'an Street, North Dongjiao Road, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Y L WangFrom Department of Andrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China.
H C LiFrom Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
C M GuDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Fangcun Branch, 36 Chong'an Street, North Dongjiao Road, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Z G BaiDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Fangcun Branch, 36 Chong'an Street, North Dongjiao Road, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Z Q ChenDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Fangcun Branch, 36 Chong'an Street, North Dongjiao Road, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
S S WangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Fangcun Branch, 36 Chong'an Street, North Dongjiao Road, Guangzhou, 510370, China. 13503059270@163.com.
S T XiangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Fangcun Branch, 36 Chong'an Street, North Dongjiao Road, Guangzhou, 510370, China. tonyxst@163.com.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo analyze the risk factors for progression of urolith associated with obstructive urosepsis to severe sepsis or septic shock, we had done the retrospective cross-sectional study, which would facilitate the early identification of high-risk patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsDatas were retrospectively reviewed from 160 patients, suffering from obstructive urosepsis associated with urolith between December 2013 and December 2019. There were 49 patients complicating by severe sepsis (severe sepsis group), 12 patients complicating by septic shock (septic shock group), and 99 patients without progressing to severe sepsis or septic shock (sepsis group). The data covered age, gender, BMI (body mass index), time interval from ED (emergency department) to admission, WBC count (white blood cell count), NLR (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio), HGB (hemoglobin), etc. Datas were analyzed by univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The corresponding nomogram prediction model was drawn according to the regression coefficients.

resultsUnivariate analysis showed that the differences of age, the time interval from ED to admission, history of diabetes mellitus, history of CKI (chronic kidney disease), NLR, HGB, platelet count, TBil (total bilirubin), SCr (serum creatinine), ALB (albumin), PT (prothrombin time), APTT (activated partial thromboplastin time), INR (international normalized ratio), PCT (procalcitonin), and positive rate of pathogens in blood culture were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Multivariatelogistic regression analysis showed that age, SCr, and history of CKI were independent risk factors for progression to severe sepsis, or septic shock (P < 0.05).

conclusionsAged ≥ 65 years, SCr ≥ 248 mol/L, and history of CKI were independent risk factors for progression of urolith associated with obstructive urosepsis to severe sepsis or septic shock. We need to pay more attention to these aspects, when coming across the patients with urolithic sepsis.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsRisk factorsSeptic shockSevere sepsisUrolithUrosepsis

Identifiers

PMID35346141
PMCPMC8962082
OpenAlexW4220720705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.