Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346133›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2022

Early detection and intervention for young children with early developmental disabilities in Western Uganda: a mixed-methods evaluation.

S Sadoo, R Nalugya, R Lassman, M Kohli-Lynch, G Chariot, H G Davies, E Katuutu, M Clee, J Seeley, E L Webb and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Provision of rehabilitation for congenital conditions.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

S Sadoo *London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
R Nalugya *Spina bifida and Hydrocephalus association of Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
R LassmanKyaninga Child Development Centre, Fort Portal, Kabarole, Uganda. rlassman@hotmail.com.
M Kohli-LynchLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
G ChariotKyaninga Child Development Centre, Fort Portal, Kabarole, Uganda.
H G DaviesSt George's University London, London, UK.
E KatuutuFort Portal Regional Referral Hospital, Fort Portal, Kabarole, Uganda.
M CleeNeonatal Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
J SeeleyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
E L WebbLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
R Mutoni VedastineKyaninga Child Development Centre, Fort Portal, Kabarole, Uganda.
F BeckerleggeKyaninga Child Development Centre, Fort Portal, Kabarole, Uganda.
C J TannLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
Fort Portal Hospital · UGUniversity of London · GBUniversity College London · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUganda Virus Research Institute · UGUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Medical Research Council MR/V035274/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly support for children with developmental disabilities is crucial but frequently unavailable in low-resource settings. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a programme of early detection and intervention for young children with developmental disabilities in Western Uganda.

methodsEarly child development training for healthcare workers (HCWs) was implemented in three rural districts, and attendance was tracked. HCW knowledge and confidence were assessed pre-/post-intervention, and referral numbers tracked to evaluate impact. Facilitators were trained and mentored to deliver a participatory, group, early intervention programme (EIP) for young children with developmental disabilities and their families. Facilitators were tracked as they were identified, trained, and delivered the intervention, and attendance of families was tracked. Pre-/post-intervention assessments evaluated changes in family quality of life (PedsQL 2.0, Family Impact Module), and child nutritional outcomes. Focus group discussions with stakeholders also assessed feasibility, acceptability and impact.

resultsOverall, 93 HCWs from 45 healthcare facilities received training. In the pre-/post-evaluation, median knowledge and confidence scores increased significantly (from 4.0 to 7.0 and from 2.7 to 4.7, respectively (p < 0.001)). HCWs reported feeling empowered to refer and offer care for families with a young child with disability. Referral rates increased significantly from 148 to 251 per annum (70%; p = 0.03). Eleven EIP facilitators were trained, and all delivered the intervention; 84 families were enrolled, of which 78% attended at least 6 out of 10 modules. Amongst those with paired pre-/post-intervention data (n = 48), total family quality of life scores increased significantly (21%, p < 0.001). Improvements were seen across all domains of quality of life, with the largest impacts on emotional functioning and social functioning (p < 0.001). The programme was acceptable to caregivers and facilitators. Caregivers reported improved knowledge, family relationships, hope, emotional wellbeing, and reduced self-stigma.

conclusionsA programme of early detection and intervention for children with early developmental disabilities and their families was feasible and acceptable in a rural community-based Ugandan setting. HCW training positively impacted knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and referral rates. Families enrolled to the EIP reported significant improvements in quality of life. Important programmatic barriers identified included geographical spread, poverty, gender inequality, and stigma.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesQuality of LifeCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolFamilyHumansUgandaDevelopmental disabilityEarly detectionEarly interventionUganda

Identifiers

PMID35346133
PMCPMC8962031
OpenAlexW4220654118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.