Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346122›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Recurrence and prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients with different etiology after radical resection: a multi-institutional study.

Qi Li, Chen Chen, Jingbo Su, Yinghe Qiu, Hong Wu, Tianqiang Song, Xianhai Mao, Yu He, Zhangjun Cheng, Jingdong Li and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epidemiology of biliary tract cancer in China: A narrative review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Qi LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Chen ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Jingbo SuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Yinghe QiuDepartment of Biliary Surgery, Oriental Hepatobiliary Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Hong WuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Tianqiang SongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Xianhai MaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, 410005, China.
Yu HeDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Zhangjun ChengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Jingdong LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, China.
Wenlong ZhaiHepatobiliary Pancreas and Liver Transplantation Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Dong ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Zhimin GengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China. gengzhimin@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.
Zhaohui TangDepartment of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China. tangzhaohui@yahoo.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNAffiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNHunan Provincial People's Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNSouthwest Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNXinHua Hospital · CNZhongda Hospital Southeast University · CN

Funding

Clinical Training Program of Shanghai Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine 17CSK06Multicenter Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine DLY201807National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 62076194, No. 81772521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the prognosis and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients with different etiology after radical resection.

methodsA total of 448 patients with ICC who underwent radical resection between 2010 and 2018 at ten Chinese tertiary hospitals were analyzed in the study. These patients were divided into conventional ICC (Con-ICC, n = 261, 58.2%), hepatitis B virus ICC (HBV-ICC, n = 102, 22.8%) and hepatolithiasis (Stone-ICC, n = 85,19.0%) subtypes according to different etiology. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to mitigate the baseline differences between Con-ICC and HBV-ICC, Con-ICC and Stone-ICC, HBV-ICC and Stone-ICC subtypes.

resultsUnivariate and multivariate analysis showed that different etiology was a prognostic factor for overall survival and relapse-free survival, and different etiology was an independent risk factor for overall survival in ICC patients, respectively (P < 0.05). In addition, there was a statistical difference for overall survival in early recurrence patients among the three etiological subtypes (P < 0.05). After PSM, the overall survival of patients with Stone-ICC was worse than those of Con-ICC and HBV-ICC subtypes (P < 0.05), while the relapse-free survival of patients with Stone-ICC was equivalent to patients with Con-ICC and HBV-ICC (P > 0.05). In Stone-ICC patients, the median overall survival was 16.0 months and 29.7 months, and the median relapse-free survival was 9.0 months and 20.0 months for non-ACT and ACT patients, respectively (P < 0.05).

conclusionThe prognosis of Stone-ICC patients was significantly worse than those of Con-ICC and HBV-ICC patients. Interestingly, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of Stone-ICC patients effectively.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaLithiasisLiver DiseasesBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisHepatitis B virusHepatolithiasisIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaPrognosisRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID35346122
PMCPMC8962079
OpenAlexW4226078383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.