Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346119›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

HIV self-testing implementation, distribution and use among female sex workers in Cotonou, Benin: a qualitative evaluation of acceptability and feasibility.

Marianne Boisvert Moreau, Frédéric D Kintin, Septime Atchekpe, Georges Batona, Luc Béhanzin, Fernand A Guédou, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Michel Alary

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marianne Boisvert MoreauCentre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada. marianne.boisvert-moreau.1@ulaval.ca.
Frédéric D KintinDispensaire IST, Centre communal de santé de Cotonou-Zone1, Cotonou, Bénin.
Septime AtchekpeDispensaire IST, Centre communal de santé de Cotonou-Zone1, Cotonou, Bénin.
Georges BatonaWorld Health Organization, Brazzaville, Congo.
Luc BéhanzinCentre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Fernand A GuédouCentre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Marie-Pierre GagnonCentre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Michel AlaryCentre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Progamme National Contre le Tuberculose · BJUniversité Laval · CAUniversité de Parakou · BJWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa · CG

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Benin, the burden of HIV is disproportionately high among female sex workers (FSWs). HIV testing and knowledge of status are starting points for HIV treatment and prevention interventions. Despite the importance given to testing services in HIV control, its uptake among FSWs remains suboptimal in Benin. HIV self-testing (HIVST) may be useful for increasing testing rates in FSWs.

methodsWe conducted a pilot study of the distribution of saliva-based HIVST among FSWs in Cotonou and its surroundings, Benin. The HIVST promotion and distribution model included three complementary strategies: community-based, facility-based and secondary distribution. In this qualitative study, we explored the elements influencing HIVST implementation, distribution and use among FSWs. We assessed HIVST acceptability and feasibility in this population. We conducted 29 semi-structured individual interviews with FSWs. Data were interpreted with a thematic analysis method, using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

resultsOnly two FSWs (6.9%) were aware of HIVST before participating in the study. All participants were interested in using HIVST if available in Benin. Many advantages of HIVST were mentioned, including: autonomy, privacy, accessibility, time saving, and the fact that it is a painless test. Barriers to the use of HIVST included: the fear of unreliability, the lack of psychological support and medical follow-up and the possibility of result dissimulation. Participants thought HIVST was easy to use without assistance. HIVST enabled linkage to care for a few FSWs in denial of their HIV-positive status. No case of suicide or violence associated with HIVST was reported. HIVST secondary distribution within FSWs social network was well received. FSWs' boyfriends and clients showed interest in using the device. Some FSWs reported using HIVST to practice serosorting or to guide their decisions regarding condom use.

conclusionsOur study shows a very high level of acceptability for HIVST among FSWs in Cotonou and its surroundings. Results also demonstrate the feasibility of implementing HIVST distribution in Benin. HIVST should be implemented in Benin quickly and free of charge for all individuals at risk of HIV. HIVST offer should be integrated with comprehensive sexual health and prevention services.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSex WorkersBeninFeasibility StudiesFemaleHIV SerosortingHIV TestingHomosexuality, MaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsSelf-TestingAcceptabilityBeninFeasibilityFemale sex workersHIVHIV self-testingTheoretical Domains Framework

Identifiers

PMID35346119
PMCPMC8962183
OpenAlexW4225474445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.