Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35346054›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

HABIT (Health visitors delivering Advice in Britain on Infant Toothbrushing): a qualitative exploration of the acceptability of a complex oral health intervention.

Amrit Bhatti, Faye Wray, Ieva Eskytė, Kara A Gray-Burrows, Jenny Owen, Erin Giles, Timothy Zoltie, Victoria Smith, Sue Pavitt, Robert West and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amrit BhattiUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, England. a.bhatti@leeds.ac.uk.
Faye WrayBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, United Kingdom, England.
Ieva EskytėUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, England.
Kara A Gray-BurrowsUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, England.
Jenny OwenUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, England.
Erin GilesUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, England.
Timothy ZoltieUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, England.
Victoria SmithBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, United Kingdom, England.
Sue PavittUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, England.
Robert WestUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, England.
Rosemary Rc McEachanBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, United Kingdom, England.
Zoe MarshmanUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom, England.
Peter F DayUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, England.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P017185/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore the acceptability of the oral health intervention, HABIT (Health visitors delivering Advice in Britain on Infant Toothbrushing) to parents with young children aged 9-12 months and health visitors.

methodsFollowing the delivery of the universal oral health intervention called HABIT, qualitative semi-structured interviews with parents and focus groups with health visitors were undertaken. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Health visitors completed self-reported diaries after delivering the HABIT intervention with parents. The qualitative data was analysed using framework analysis (guided by a theoretical framework of acceptability).

resultsSeventeen parents were interviewed, and five health visitors and three nursery nurses participated in two focus groups. Parents reported health visitors to be 'trusted' and valued the reassurance provided during the HABIT visit. Health visitors found the HABIT training and resources useful and valued the consistency and increased confidence in undertaking oral health conversations. There were, however, challenges in changing behaviour where families faced competing demands on time and resources. Both health visitors and parents described the importance of the intervention's timing and suggested that multiple visits may be needed to support optimal oral health habits.

conclusionThe HABIT intervention was acceptable to parents and health visitors. Health visitors would welcome a further refinement to enhance intervention delivery that specifically achieves a balance between using a guided script and retaining the flexibility to adapt the conversation to suit the needs of individual families. This, in turn, will maximise impact and enable parents of young children to adopt and maintain optimal home-based oral health behaviours for their child.

Indexed as

Nurses, Community HealthOral HealthChildChild, PreschoolHabitsHumansInfantToothbrushingUnited KingdomAcceptabilityBehaviour change conversationsDental cariesDental teamFramework analysisHealth visitorsInterventionOral health habitsParentsQualitativeTheoretical framework of acceptabilityTheory

Identifiers

PMID35346054
PMCPMC8962587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.