Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35345792›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Lichtenstein versus transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair for unilateral non recurrent hernia: A multicenter short term randomized comparative study of clinical outcomes.

Ahmed Abd El Aal Sultan, Hossam Attia Abo Elazm, Hisham Omran

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. [Inguinal hernia operations-Always outpatient?]Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed Abd El Aal SultanGeneral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine - Al-Azhar University, Egypt.
Hossam Attia Abo ElazmGeneral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine - Ain Shams University, Egypt.
Hisham OmranGeneral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine - Ain Shams University, Egypt.
Ain Shams University · EGAl-Azhar University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The repair of inguinal hernia is still one of the most prevalent surgical procedures done worldwide. Among all repair techniques, open Lichtenstein repair is the most globally conducted. In the past few decades, laparoscopic technique for inguinal hernia repair has increased technical demand. Objective: The current work is a short-term study to make a comparison between open Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia as well as laparoscopic Patients and methods: The present prospective randomized study recruited 100 male subjects from General Surgery Department of Al-Azhar University Hospitals and Ain Shams university hospitals suffering from oblique inguinal hernia (unilateral non recurrent hernia) with an age above 18 years and good overall health, who were randomized into two groups: Group A: 49 cases were subjected to laparoscopic Results: This study detected less post-operative pain day 0, day 1, day 7 and 1 month postoperatively. There was no significant difference at 6 months post-operatively. Conclusion: Finally, we concluded that TAPP repair for inguinal hernia (unilateral non recurrent hernia) safer with less early post-operative pain. Also, it has fewer complications, with a significantly longer operative time.

Indexed as

Inguinal herniaLichtenstein repairPost-operative painTAPPTrans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair

Identifiers

PMID35345792
PMCPMC8957018
OpenAlexW4220750810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.