Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35345791›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Cross-cultural validation of stool Based Colorectal cancer screening methods in the North West of Iran.

Roya Dolatkhah, Mohammad Hossein Somi, Saeed Dastgiri, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Hossein Mashhadi Abdolahi, Dariush Shanehbandi, Milad Asadi, Marzieh Nezamdoust, Neda Dolatkhah, Faris Farassati

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Roya DolatkhahHematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein SomiLiver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Saeed DastgiriTabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad Asghari JafarabadiDept. Of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Hossein Mashhadi AbdolahiTabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Dariush ShanehbandiImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Milad AsadiImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Marzieh NezamdoustTabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Neda DolatkhahPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Aging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Faris FarassatiMidwest Biomedical Research Foundation, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRBiomedical Research Foundation · USZanjan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of death from cancer. Incidence and mortality from CRCboth can be reduced and prevented using screening and early detection programs. The current study aimed to assess the feasibility of the colorectal cancer screening program in Northwest of Iran. Methods: The study designed as a cross-cultural analytic study, to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of stool-based tests compared with colonoscopy, during 2016-2020. All individuals first were assessed with our CRC risk assessment tool, then eligible volunteers entered the study. Colonoscopy was performed on all participants, also stool-based tests including traditional guaiac, high-sensitivity guaiac-based, fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and multitarget stool DNA (Mt-sDNA) panel tests were performed. Results: Mt-sDNA test panel had a sensitivity of 77.8% (95% CI: 40-97.2)for detecting colorectal cancer with a specificity of 91.2% (95% CI:85.4-95.2). The FIT test alone had a lower sensitivity (66.7%; 95% CI:29.9-92.5) and almost the same specificity of 93.9% (95% CI: 88.7-97.2) for cancer detection. Mt-sDNA test had better diagnostic accuracy than the FIT (AUC = 0.85 vs 0.80), and is a more useful screening test. Positive and negative predictive values for cancer detection for both Mt-sDNA and FIT tests were almost the same results, however Mt-sDNA test had better NPV results than the FIT test alone. Conclusion: Our results showed that both Mt-sDNA panel and the FIT test had acceptable cut-off points for cancer detection, however, Mt-sDNA test had better diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal cancerDiagnostic accuracyScreeningStool based test

Identifiers

PMID35345791
PMCPMC8956879
OpenAlexW4226236608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.