ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022
Establishment and Evaluation of an Internal Quality Control Method for ESR Relays.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance Evaluation of Automated Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Analyzers in a Multicentric Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study establish and evaluate an internal quality control system for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) by a "relay" mode based on samples from relevant patients. Methods: The method for establishing a new internal quality control system for ESR by a "relay" mode based on patient's samples was executed from February 2021 to July 2021. In this paper, a total of 219 outpatients were recruited for ESR determination, and their blood samples were stored at 4 °C or room temperature for 24 h. Subsequently, the samples were re-measured for ESR, and the re-measured values were compared with the initial values. The patient samples (15±1mm/h and 50±3mm/h) were selected after the TEST1 ESR analyzer was calibrated, and were stored overnight at 4 °C and measured again the following day. The percentage deviation was determined and entered into the quality control management module for internal quality control. Next, we analyzed the median distribution trend of the patients' ESR values measured by our laboratory every day over five months, as well as the external quality assessment (EQA) results for ESR obtained from the National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL). Results: The ESR of the room temperature samples after 24 h of storage had significantly decreased (P=0.001), while there was no noticeable difference for those stored at 4 °C (P=0.197). Results of the internal quality control in March were satisfactory, and there was no significant deviation in the median ESR relay results within five months. Besides, the EQA results for the ESR data obtained from NCCL were excellent. Conclusion: As a precise and practical new method, the ESR relay internal quality control method can be used to scientifically determine the stability and accuracy of the TEST1 ESR analyzer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.