Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35345703›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Classifying the Acquisition Sequence for Brain MRIs Using Neural Networks on Single Slices.

Norbert Braeker, Cornelia Schmitz, Natalie Wagner, Badrudin J Stanicki, Christina Schröder, Felix Ehret, Christoph Fürweger, Daniel R Zwahlen, Robert Förster, Alexander Muacevic and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Norbert BraekerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, CHE.
Cornelia SchmitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, CHE.
Natalie WagnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, CHE.
Badrudin J StanickiData Science, Propulsion Academy, Zurich, CHE.
Christina SchröderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, CHE.
Felix EhretRadiosurgery, European Cyberknife Center, Munich, DEU.
Christoph FürwegerMedical Physics, European CyberKnife Center, Munich, DEU.
Daniel R ZwahlenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, CHE.
Robert FörsterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, CHE.
Alexander MuacevicRadiosurgery, European CyberKnife Center, Munich, DEU.
Paul WindischDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, CHE.
Kantonsspital Winterthur · CHCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Neural networks for analyzing MRIs are oftentimes trained on particular combinations of perspectives and acquisition sequences. Since real-world data are less structured and do not follow a standard denomination of acquisition sequences, this impedes the transition from deep learning research to clinical application. The purpose of this study is therefore to assess the feasibility of classifying the acquisition sequence from a single MRI slice using convolutional neural networks. Methods A total of 113 MRI slices from 52 patients were used in a transfer learning approach to train three convolutional neural networks of different complexities to predict the acquisition sequence, while 27 slices were used for internal validation. The model then underwent external validation on 600 slices from 273 patients belonging to one of four classes (T1-weighted without contrast enhancement, T1-weighted with contrast enhancement, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted). Categorical accuracy was noted, and the results of the predictions for the validation set are provided with confusion matrices. Results The neural networks achieved a categorical accuracy of 0.79, 0.81, and 0.84 on the external validation data. The implementation of Grad-CAM showed no clear pattern of focus except for T2-weighted slices, where the network focused on areas containing cerebrospinal fluid. Conclusion Automatically classifying the acquisition sequence using neural networks seems feasible and could be used to facilitate the automatic labelling of MRI data.

Indexed as

acquisition sequencebrain imagingdeep learninggrad-cammriperspective

Identifiers

PMID35345703
PMCPMC8941825
OpenAlexW4212786584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.