Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35345658›Full record

SynthesisJournal of healthcare engineering2022

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Comparative Kinematics in the Lumbopelvic Region in the Patients Suffering from Spinal Pain.

ZhiRui Zheng, YouQiang Wang, Tong Wang, Yue Wu, YuHui Li

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

ZhiRui ZhengThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Orthopedic Surgery Three Ward, Harbin, Heilonjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4491-523X
YouQiang WangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Orthopedic Surgery Three Ward, Harbin, Heilonjiang, China.
Tong WangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Orthopedic Surgery Three Ward, Harbin, Heilonjiang, China.
Yue WuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Orthopedic Surgery Three Ward, Harbin, Heilonjiang, China.
YuHui LiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Orthopedic Surgery Three Ward, Harbin, Heilonjiang, China.
Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lumbopelvic kinematics has been observed to include different parameters and directly relate to the movement of the hip spine. In the current scenario, more than 65 million people have been suffering from spinal pain, and 18% of adults experience chronic spinal pain. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis selected 9 studies for analysis via electronic databases like EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane (CENTRAL). After collecting the data, the dataset has been systematically analyzed through statistical methodologies using RevMan and Stata. Results: Out of 116 studies initially scrutinized, nine were finally selected for the meta-analysis. When range of motion was studied via meta-analysis, it was noted that a considerable reduced movement was noted in the lumbar region of the spine when people were suffering from lower back pain in comparison to control group people. Hence, reduced lumbar range of motion, no difference in the angle of lordosis, and no significant difference in extension and rotation in people with lower back pain were found. However, variability was noted in people suffering from lower back pain for flexion and lateral flexion. A significant heterogeneity was found between the studies which lacked some details and standardization of the criteria which were used for defining patients with lower back pain or without them (control group). Results show that spinal pain is the main reason behind the limitation of lumbar range of motion. It is clear from the data set of mean and standard deviation, and this is clear to establish the relationship between the causes of pelvic and spinal pain. In flexion-based ROM, the mean difference was found to be -9.77 (95% CI: -21.86, 2.32). Similarly, for lateral flexion, the mean difference was found to be -5.58 (with 95% CI: -10.38, -0.79). Conclusion: It can be concluded that spinal disease is too influential for people; thereby, it affects day-to-day life activities by creating painful and restricted movements. It is concluded that people suffering from lower back pain have reduced proprioception and range of movement in the lumbar region when compared to control groups with no lower back pain, which mainly focus on flexion and lateral flexion.

Indexed as

Low Back PainAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

PMID35345658
PMCPMC8957439
OpenAlexW4221133973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.