ArticlePeerJ2022
Reference values for bone density and bone mineral content from 5 to 80 years old in a province of Chile.
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05346419 (Risedronate With High-dose Vitamin D Resolves Hyperparathyroidism and Hypovitaminosis D But Not Osteoporosis in Mexican Postmenopausal Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Risedronate With High-dose Vitamin D Resolves Hyperparathyroidism and Hypovitaminosis D But Not Osteoporosis in Mexican Postmenopausal Patients
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation between the osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians index and QCT-derived bone parameters: a cross-sectional analysis of lumbar spine mineral density and content.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Sex and age specific bone mineral density trends in Sri Lankan adults support the need for normative reference data.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Ultrasonography reference values for the calcaneus in children and adolescents living at high altitude in Peru.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Age- and Sex-Related Volumetric Density Differences in Trabecular and Cortical Bone of the Proximal Femur in Healthy Population.Journal of bone metabolism · 2024Article
- Association between Sarcopenia and Reduced Bone Mass: Is Osteosarcopenic Obesity a New Phenotype to Consider in Weight Management Settings?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Relationship between age and handgrip strength: Proposal of reference values from infancy to senescence.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Comparison of bone mineral density between female amateur triathletes and nonathletes: A cross-sectional study.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The assessment of bone health throughout the life cycle is essential to determine fracture risk. The objectives of the work were (a) compare bone mineral density and content with international references from the United States, (b) determine maximum bone mass, (c) propose references for bone health measurements from ages 5 to 80 years old. Methods: Research was carried out on 5,416 subjects. Weight and height were measured. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated. The total body was scanned using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Information was extracted from the bone health measures (bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC)) for both sexes, according to pediatric and adult software. Results and Discussion: Differences were identified between the mean values of Chilean and American men for BMD (~0.03 to 0.11 g/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.