Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35345556›Full record

ArticleNeural computing & applications2022

Pima Indians diabetes mellitus classification based on machine learning (ML) algorithms.

Victor Chang, Jozeene Bailey, Qianwen Ariel Xu, Zhili Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computing & applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Advanced CNN Deep Learning Model for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Large Models for Small Tables: Adapting Tabular Foundation Models to EHR Data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Foundation Model-Guided Synthetic EHR Release: Performance Enhancement with Privacy Preservation.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victor ChangDepartment of Operations and Information Management, Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8012-5852
Jozeene BaileyCybersecurity, Information Systems and AI Research Group, School of Computing and Digital Technologies, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Qianwen Ariel XuCybersecurity, Information Systems and AI Research Group, School of Computing and Digital Technologies, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Zhili SunInstitute for Communication Systems (ICS), 5G and 6G Innovation Centre (5G&6GIC), University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes an e-diagnosis system based on machine learning (ML) algorithms to be implemented on the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) environment, particularly for diagnosing diabetes mellitus (type 2 diabetes). However, the ML applications tend to be mistrusted because of their inability to show the internal decision-making process, resulting in slow uptake by end-users within certain healthcare sectors. This research delineates the use of three interpretable supervised ML models: Naïve Bayes classifier, random forest classifier, and J48 decision tree models to be trained and tested using the Pima Indians diabetes dataset in R programming language. The performance of each algorithm is analyzed to determine the one with the best accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity. An assessment of the decision process is also made to improve the model. It can be concluded that a Naïve Bayes model works well with a more fine-tuned selection of features for binary classification, while random forest works better with more features.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusInterpretable artificial intelligenceMachine learningThe Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)

Identifiers

PMID35345556
PMCPMC8943493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.