Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35345523›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Identification of Nine mRNA Signatures for Sepsis Using Random Forest.

Jing Zhou, Siqing Dong, Ping Wang, Xi Su, Liang Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing ZhouIntensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5058-4524
Siqing DongBeidahuang Industry Group General Hospital, Harbin 150001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2070-5019
Ping WangCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4451-1585
Xi SuFoshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan 528000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3235-8114
Liang ChengCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6665-6710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis has high fatality rates. Early diagnosis could increase its curating rates. There were no reliable molecular biomarkers to distinguish between infected and uninfected patients currently, which limit the treatment of sepsis. To this end, we analyzed gene expression datasets from the GEO database to identify its mRNA signature. First, two gene expression datasets (GSE154918 and GSE131761) were downloaded to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using Limma package. Totally 384 common DEGs were found in three contrast groups. We found that as the condition worsens, more genes were under disorder condition. Then, random forest model was performed with expression matrix of all genes as feature and disease state as label. After which 279 genes were left. We further analyzed the functions of 279 important DEGs, and their potential biological roles mainly focused on neutrophil threshing, neutrophil activation involved in immune response, neutrophil-mediated immunity, RAGE receptor binding, long-chain fatty acid binding, specific granule, tertiary granule, and secretory granule lumen. Finally, the top nine mRNAs (MCEMP1, PSTPIP2, CD177, GCA, NDUFAF1, CLIC1, UFD1, SEPT9, and UBE2A) associated with sepsis were considered as signatures for distinguishing between sepsis and healthy controls. Based on 5-fold cross-validation and leave-one-out cross-validation, the nine mRNA signature showed very high AUC.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSepsisBiomarkersChloride ChannelsHumansNeutrophilsRNA, MessengerUbiquitin-Conjugating EnzymesBiomarkersChloride ChannelsCLIC1 protein, humanRNA, MessengerUBE2A protein, humanUbiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID35345523
PMCPMC8957445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.