Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35345439›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2022

Synthetic diversity in the preparation of metallic uranium.

Harry Jang, James Louis-Jean, Bradley Childs, Kiel Holliday, Dallas Reilly, Matthew Athon, Kenneth Czerwinski, David Hatchett, Frederic Poineau

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Harry JangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
James Louis-JeanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Bradley ChildsMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Kiel HollidayMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Dallas ReillyPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Matthew AthonPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Kenneth CzerwinskiDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
David HatchettDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Frederic PoineauDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9517-2264

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uranium metal is associated with several aspects of nuclear technology; it is used as fuel for research and power reactors, targets for medical isotope productions, explosive for nuclear weapons and precursors in synthetic chemistry. The study of uranium metal at the laboratory scale presents the opportunity to evaluate metallic nuclear fuels, develop new methods for metallic spent fuel reprocessing and advance the science relevant to nuclear forensics and medical isotope production. Since its first isolation in 1841, from the reaction of uranium chloride and potassium metal, uranium metal has been prepared by solid-state reactions and in solution by electrochemical, chemical and radiochemical methods. The present review summarizes the methods outlined above and describes the chemistry associated with each preparation.

Indexed as

decompositionelectrochemistrymetalpreparationreductionuranium

Identifiers

PMID35345439
PMCPMC8941384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.