Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35345084›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2022

Effect of autologous platelet-rich plasma for treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a randomized controlled trial.

Leila Nazari, Saghar Salehpour, Sedighe Hosseini, Teibeh Hashemi, Nasrin Borumandnia, Elham Azizi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Autologous platelet-rich plasma for assisted reproduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leila NazariPreventative Gynecology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saghar SalehpourPreventative Gynecology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sedighe HosseiniPreventative Gynecology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Teibeh HashemiPreventative Gynecology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nasrin BorumandniaUrology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Elham AziziPreventative Gynecology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Taleghani General Hospital · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 18041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a fertility problem for which no exact mechanism of abortion or efficient treatment has been described. This study was conducted between 2018 and 2019 to investigate the effectiveness of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in improving the live birth rate of women with RPL who required in vitro fertilization (IVF).

methodsA total of 63 patients with at least two previous pregnancy losses and no specific cause detected for the RPL were included and randomly assigned into two groups (PRP and control). Intrauterine infusion of 0.5 mL of autologous PRP was performed 48 hours before embryo transfer in the PRP group. Women in the control group received standard treatment.

resultsForty patients completed the study. The baseline and cycle characteristics of the participants did not differ significantly between the PRP and control groups. The clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the PRP group (35% vs. 20%, P=0.288). The live birth rate was 15% in the PRP group, but no live births were recorded in the control group (P=0.231).

conclusionThis is the first study to show that intrauterine infusion of PRP in patients with RPL who undergo IVF may increase the chance of live birth.

Indexed as

In vitro fertilizationLive-birthPlatelet-rich plasmaRecurrent pregnancy loss

Identifiers

PMID35345084
PMCPMC9119727
OpenAlexW4221075020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.