Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35345078›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2021

Anku Goel, Varsha Gupta, Lipika Singhal, Sanjeev Palta, Jagdish Chander

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sensitizing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae using a compact Cascade-Cas3 system.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Elimination of blaBMC microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anku GoelDepartment of Microbiology, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Varsha GuptaDepartment of Microbiology, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Lipika SinghalDepartment of Microbiology, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Sanjeev PaltaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Jagdish ChanderDepartment of Microbiology, Government Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Government Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives: The prevalence of severe infections due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) strains has increased worldwide. With rising resistance to polymyxins, the treatment has become challenging. Given the paucity of novel agents and limited data on combination therapy for CRKP, the present study was performed to test antibiotic combinations, for synergy against clinical isolates of CRKP. Methods: A total of 50 clinical isolates of CRKP were included. Modified carbapenem inactivation method was performed for the detection of carbapenemases. In vitro synergy testing was done for the following combinations: meropenem+colistin, imipenem+tigecycline and polymyxin B+levofloxacin. It was performed with epsilometric test and microdilution checkerboard method. The time kill assay (TKA) was used to confirm the results. The fractional inhibitory concentration was also calculated. Results: All CRKP isolates (100%) were ESBL producers and were completely resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam. Resistance to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and tetracycline was 96, 88 and 54 per cent, respectively. Overall, 78 (39/50) and 88 per cent (44/50) of the 50 CRKP isolates exhibited synergy by TKA for meropenem-colistin and imipenem-tigecycline, respectively. No synergy was detected for levofloxacin-polymyxin B combination. The best combination among the three was that of imipenem and tigecycline followed by meropenem-colistin. Interpretation & conclusions: Of the three combinations tested, imipenem and tigecycline followed by meropenem-colistin were found to be best. No synergy was detected for levofloxacin-polymyxin B combination.

Indexed as

Carbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeKlebsiella pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistinHumansImipenemLevofloxacinMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymyxin BTigecyclineAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistinImipenemLevofloxacinMeropenemPolymyxin BTigecyclineAntibiotic synergycarbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniaecombination therapymicrodilution checkerboard methodtime kill assay

Identifiers

PMID35345078
PMCPMC9131782
OpenAlexW4285518683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.