ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2022
Engineering the T cell receptor for fun and profit: Uncovering complex biology, interrogating the immune system, and targeting disease.
Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glypican-3-targeted therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: biological insights and therapeutic strategies.Cancer gene therapy · 2026Review
- The adaptive immune receptors in a big data world.ImmunoHorizons · 2026Review
- Focusing on CD8Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024Review
- Exploring the potential of structure-based deep learning approaches for T cell receptor design.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Exploring the Potential of Structure-Based Deep Learning Approaches for T cell Receptor Design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Enhanced T cell receptor specificity through framework engineering.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- T cell receptor therapeutics: immunological targeting of the intracellular cancer proteome.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
T cell receptors (TCRs) orchestrate cellular immunity by recognizing peptide antigens bound and presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins. Due to the TCR's central role in immunity and tight connection with human health, there has been significant interest in modulating TCR properties through protein engineering methods. Complicating these efforts is the complexity and vast diversity of TCR-peptide/MHC interfaces, the interdependency between TCR affinity, specificity, and cross-reactivity, and the sophisticated relationships between TCR binding properties and T cell function, many aspects of which are not well understood. Here we review TCR engineering, starting with a brief historical overview followed by discussions of more recent developments, including new efforts and opportunities to engineer TCR affinity, modulate specificity, and develop novel TCR-based constructs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.