Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35344796›Full record

ArticleEvaluation and program planning2022

Appreciative inquiry and the co-creation of an evaluation framework for Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) implementation: a two-country experience.

Smita Ghosh, Bruce B Struminger, Neeta Singla, Brenna M Roth, Anil Kumar, Sunil Anand, Emmanuel Mtete, Jacob Lusekelo, Irene Massawe, Elizabeth Jarpe-Ratner and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evaluation and program planning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Smita GhoshUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA; US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: sghosh1@cdc.gov.
Bruce B StrumingerUniversity of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Neeta SinglaNational Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, New Delhi, India.
Brenna M RothCenter for International Health, Education, and Biosecurity, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anil KumarECHO India, New Delhi, India.
Sunil AnandECHO India, New Delhi, India.
Emmanuel MteteUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Jacob LusekeloMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and Children, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Irene MassaweCenter for International Health, Education, and Biosecurity, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Center for International Health, Education, and Biosecurity, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Elizabeth Jarpe-RatnerUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
Steven M SewerynUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kris RisleyUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
Patrick K MoonanUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Eve PinskerUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent gaps exist in healthcare workers' capacity to address HIV and tuberculosis in Asia and Africa due to constraints in resources and knowledge. Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) leverages video-enabled technology to build workforce capacity and promote collaboration through mentorship and case-based learning. To understand current perceptions of ECHO participants and develop a comprehensive evaluation framework for ECHO implementation, we utilized modified appreciative inquiry guided focus group discussions (FGD) in India and Tanzania and called it SCORE (Strengths, Challenges, Opportunities, Results, and Evaluation). Content and thematic analysis of transcripts from FGDs and key-informant interviews triangulated perceptions of diverse stakeholders about ECHO implementation and identified key elements for development of the framework. The perceived strengths (S) were capacity building and establishing communities of practice. The perceived challenges (C) included securing resources, engaging leadership, and building systems for monitoring impact. Improved internet connectivity, addressing logistical challenges, encouraging session interactivity, and having strategic scale-up plans were perceived opportunities (O). Additionally, gathering measurable results (R) led to development of a comprehensive evaluation (E) framework. Contextualizing and facilitating SCORE with qualitative analysis of findings 6-12 months post-ECHO implementation may serve as a best practice to assess mid-course corrections to improve ECHO implementation quality.

Indexed as

LeadershipMentorsCommunity Health ServicesFocus GroupsHumansProgram EvaluationAppreciative inquiryEvaluationHIVQualitative researchStrategic planningSystems thinkingTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35344796
PMCPMC9177619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.