Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35344775›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2022

The relation between conspiracism, government trust, and COVID-19 vaccination intentions: The key role of motivation.

Pascaline Van Oost, Vincent Yzerbyt, Mathias Schmitz, Maarten Vansteenkiste, Olivier Luminet, Sofie Morbée, Omer Van den Bergh, Joachim Waterschoot, Olivier Klein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
28.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pascaline Van OostFaculty of Psychological Sciences and Education, Université libre de Bruxelles, CP 122 Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium; Institute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Place Cardinal Mercier 10, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. Electronic address: pascaline.vanoost@uclouvain.be.
Vincent YzerbytInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Place Cardinal Mercier 10, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. Electronic address: vincent.yzerbyt@uclouvain.be.
Mathias SchmitzInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Place Cardinal Mercier 10, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. Electronic address: mathias.schmitz@uclouvain.be.
Maarten VansteenkisteDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Universiteit Gent, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium. Electronic address: maarten.vansteenkiste@ugent.be.
Olivier LuminetInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Place Cardinal Mercier 10, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Fund for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS), Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: olivier.luminet@uclouvain.be.
Sofie MorbéeDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Universiteit Gent, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium. Electronic address: sofie.morbee@ugent.be.
Omer Van den BerghHealth Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tiensestraat 102 Box 3726, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: omer.vandenbergh@kuleuven.be.
Joachim WaterschootDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Universiteit Gent, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium. Electronic address: joachim.waterschoot@ugent.be.
Olivier KleinFaculty of Psychological Sciences and Education, Université libre de Bruxelles, CP 122 Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium. Electronic address: olivier.klein@ulb.be.
Ghent University · BEIon Beam Applications (Belgium) · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEFund for Scientific Research · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleVaccination willingness is a critical step in the effort to reach herd immunity and control the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, many people remain reluctant to be vaccinated.

objectiveIntegrating the literature on Self-Determination Theory, trust in authorities, and conspiracy theories, this research examines (a) the direct and indirect effect of government trust and conspiracism via underlying forms of motivations for (not) getting vaccinated against COVID-19 and (b) whether these associations differ across the two largely politically independent Belgian linguistic groups.

methodsUsing Structural Equation Modeling, we tested our models in two independent samples, in February 2021 (T1) and April 2021 (T2) (Total N = 8264).

resultsAt T1 and T2, Government trust and conspiracism both predict COVID-19 vaccination intention, respectively positively and negatively. These relations are fully mediated by motivational factors, with identified motivations having a larger positive contribution. Looking at linguistic context, differences emerge at T2, with French-speaking Belgians showing lower levels of government trust and higher levels of conspiracism than Dutch speakers.

conclusionsResults highlight the importance of integrating distal (trust in government, conspiracism) and proximal (motivational) variables to understand vaccination intentions.

Indexed as

COVID-19IntentionCOVID-19 VaccinesGovernmentHumansMotivationPandemicsTrustVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesConspiracismCOVID-19Government trustMotivationVaccination

Identifiers

PMID35344775
PMCPMC8928706
OpenAlexW4220753947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.