Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35344750›Full record

Trial reportESMO open2022

Treatment-related adverse events as predictive biomarkers of efficacy in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors treated with surufatinib: results from two phase III studies.

J Li, Y Cheng, C Bai, J Xu, L Shen, J Li, Z Zhou, Z Li, Y Chi, X Yu and 12 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02588170 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Phase III Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Surufatinib Compared to Placebo in Patients With Advanced Extrapancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorHutchison Medipharma LimitedRan2015 to 2022Enrolled219ConditionsNeuroendocrine TumorsArmsSurufatinib, Placebo
NCT02589821 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Phase III Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Surufatinib Compared to Placebo in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorHutchison Medipharma LimitedRan2015 to 2022Enrolled195ConditionsNeuroendocrine TumorsArmsSurufatinib, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

J LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Y ChengDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
C BaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Electronic address: baichunmei1964@163.com.
J XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. Electronic address: jmxu2003@yahoo.com.
L ShenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China. Electronic address: linshenpku@163.com.
J LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Z ZhouDepartment of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Z LiDepartment of Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Y ChiNational Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
X YuDepartment of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
E LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
N XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
T LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
W LouDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Y BaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
X YuanDepartment of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
X WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Y YuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
J ChenDepartment of Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China.
S GuanDepartment of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs, HUTCHMED, Shanghai, China.
S FanDepartment of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs, HUTCHMED, Shanghai, China.
W SuDepartment of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs, HUTCHMED, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo validated biomarkers currently exist for predicting the efficacy outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with antiangiogenic therapy. We aimed to evaluate the association between treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and efficacy outcomes of surufatinib in patients with advanced NET. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe included patients with NET treated with surufatinib in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials (SANET-p and SANET-ep) in this study. The main exposure was the presence of any of the TRAEs including hypertension, proteinuria, and hemorrhage in the first 4 weeks of surufatinib treatment. The primary outcome of the study was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). PFS outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. Blinded independent image review committee (BIIRC) assessments and 4-week landmark analysis were also performed as supportive evaluations.

resultsDuring the study period, a total of 242 patients treated with surufatinib were included in the analysis, and 164 (68%) patients had at least one of hypertension, proteinuria, and hemorrhage in the first 4 weeks of treatment. The presence of TRAEs in the first 4 weeks was associated with prolonged median PFS [11.1 versus 9.2 months; HR 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97; P = 0.036]. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the presence of TRAEs was also significantly associated with longer PFS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.97; P = 0.035). Similar results were obtained in the BIIRC assessments and 4-week landmark analysis.

conclusionsTreatment-related hypertension, proteinuria, and hemorrhage could be potential biomarkers to predict antitumor efficacy of surufatinib in patients with advanced NET. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the findings.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT02589821; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02589821 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02588170; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02588170.

Indexed as

HypertensionNeuroendocrine TumorsBiomarkersFemaleHumansIndolesMaleProteinuriaPyrimidinesSulfonamidesBiomarkersIndolesPyrimidinesSulfonamidessurufatinibadverse eventbiomarkerneuroendocrine tumorSANETsurufatinib

Identifiers

PMID35344750
PMCPMC9058866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.