Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35344602›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022

Personalized local SAR prediction for parallel transmit neuroimaging at 7T from a single T1-weighted dataset.

Wyger M Brink, Sahar Yousefi, Prernna Bhatnagar, Rob F Remis, Marius Staring, Andrew G Webb

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Deep learning-based whole-brain BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. ImprovedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Deep learning-based local SAR prediction using BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. MARIE 2.0: A Perturbation Matrix Based Patient-Specific MRI Field Simulator.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wyger M BrinkC.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9974-7662
Sahar YousefiC.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2396-2504
Prernna BhatnagarC.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rob F RemisCircuits and Systems Group, Department of Microelectronics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0365-4942
Marius StaringDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2885-5812
Andrew G WebbC.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4045-9732
Leiden University Medical Center · NLDelft University of Technology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeParallel RF transmission (PTx) is one of the key technologies enabling high quality imaging at ultra-high fields (≥7T). Compliance with regulatory limits on the local specific absorption rate (SAR) typically involves over-conservative safety margins to account for intersubject variability, which negatively affect the utilization of ultra-high field MR. In this work, we present a method to generate a subject-specific body model from a single T1-weighted dataset for personalized local SAR prediction in PTx neuroimaging at 7T.

methodsMulti-contrast data were acquired at 7T (N = 10) to establish ground truth segmentations in eight tissue types. A 2.5D convolutional neural network was trained using the T1-weighted data as input in a leave-one-out cross-validation study. The segmentation accuracy was evaluated through local SAR simulations in a quadrature birdcage as well as a PTx coil model.

resultsThe network-generated segmentations reached Dice coefficients of 86.7% ± 6.7% (mean ± SD) and showed to successfully address the severe intensity bias and contrast variations typical to 7T. Errors in peak local SAR obtained were below 3.0% in the quadrature birdcage. Results obtained in the PTx configuration indicated that a safety margin of 6.3% ensures conservative local SAR estimates in 95% of the random RF shims, compared to an average overestimation of 34% in the generic "one-size-fits-all" approach.

conclusionA subject-specific body model can be automatically generated from a single T1-weighted dataset by means of deep learning, providing the necessary inputs for accurate and personalized local SAR predictions in PTx neuroimaging at 7T.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingNeural Networks, ComputerPhantoms, Imagingbody modelsdeep learningPTxSARsubject-specific

Identifiers

PMID35344602
PMCPMC9314883
OpenAlexW4221061889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.