ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2022
The influence of reinforcement schedule on experience-dependent changes in motivation.
Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding instrumental lever pressing from prefrontal, accumbens, and hippocampal local field potentials: conservation across sex, task, and dopamine depletion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Considerations for the selection and phenotyping of mouse models for the study of Alzheimer's disease.STAR protocols · 2026Review
- Ventral striatal astrocytes contribute to reinforcement learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Release From a Unique Subpopulation of Accumbal Neurons Constrains Action-Outcome Acquisition in Reward Learning.Biological psychiatry · 2025Article
- Functional neuroanatomy of dopaminergic arousal systems: implications for the wake-promoting effect of psychostimulants, with particular reference to modafinil.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2025Review
- Article
- Measuring Motivation Using the Progressive Ratio Task in Adolescent Mice.Current protocols · 2023Article
- Intense long-term training impairs brain health compared with moderate exercise: Experimental evidence and mechanisms.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The progressive ratio procedure is used across fields to assess motivation for different reinforcers, define the effects of experimental interventions on motivation, and determine experience-dependent changes in motivation. However, less is known about how operant training schedules affect performance on this widely utilized task. Here we designed an experiment to examine the effect of variable ratio versus fixed ratio training schedules of reinforcement on progressive ratio performance while holding other performance variables constant between groups. We found a robust increase in maximum ratio completed between the pretest and posttraining test highlighting a robust training effect on progressive ratio performance. However, it did not matter if the training was under a fixed or variable ratio schedule. Additionally, we show that neither individual rates during training nor extinction responding correlated with maximum ratio achieved during the sessions. Finally, we show that rates during the training sessions do correlate with extinction performance, suggesting that these variables measure a different aspect of performance that does not predict motivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.