Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35344425›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Shared in planta population and transcriptomic features of nonpathogenic members of endophytic phyllosphere microbiota.

André C Velásquez, José C Huguet-Tapia, Sheng Yang He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Spatial organization of plant defense at the infection front.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. RpoS contributes in a host-dependent manner toFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

André C VelásquezHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.ORCID 0000-0003-4686-3525
José C Huguet-TapiaDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
Sheng Yang HeHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.ORCID 0000-0003-1308-498X

Funding

Establishment of an aqueous environment as a novel mechanism of bacterial pathogenesisR01AI155441 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HE, SHENG YANG · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI155441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SignificancePlants evolved in an environment colonized by a vast number of microbes, which collectively constitute the plant microbiota. The majority of microbiota taxa are nonpathogenic and may be beneficial to plants under certain ecological or environmental conditions. We conducted experiments to understand the features of long-term interactions of nonpathogenic microbiota members with plants. We found that a multiplication-death equilibrium explained the shared long-term static populations of nonpathogenic bacteria and that in planta bacterial transcriptomic signatures were characteristic of the stationary phase, a physiological state in which stress protection responses are induced. These results may have significant implications in understanding the bulk of "nonpathogenic" plant-microbiota interactions that occur in agricultural and natural ecosystems.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaTranscriptomeBacteriaPlant LeavesPlantsbacterial transcriptomeplant immunityplant microbiotapopulation stasisPseudomonas syringae

Identifiers

PMID35344425
PMCPMC9168490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.