Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35344300›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2022

Allergen immunotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic-A survey of the German Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

Oliver Pfaar, Eckard Hamelmann, Ludger Klimek, Christian Taube, Christian Vogelberg, Martin Wagenmann, Thomas Werfel, Margitta Worm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Oliver PfaarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-9639
Eckard HamelmannDepartment of Paediatrics, Children's Center Bethel, University Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Ludger KlimekCenter for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Christian TaubeDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, University Medicine Essen - Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany.
Christian VogelbergDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Martin WagenmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology (HNO-Klinik), Düsseldorf University Hospital (UKD), Düsseldorf, Germany.
Thomas WerfelDepartment of Dermatoloy and Allergy, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Margitta WormDivision of Allergology and Immunology, Department Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DERuhrlandklinik · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEZentrum für Rhinologie und Allergologie · DE

Funding

German Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI)Philipps-Universität Marburg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen the coronavirus pandemic 2019 (COVID-19) emerged, concerns were also raised regarding the safety of allergen immunotherapy (AIT). The German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) conducted a survey to collect real-world data on the daily routine of administering subcutaneous AIT (SCIT) and sublingual AIT (SLIT) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA web-based retrospective survey using the online platform survio with 26 standardized questions was used to survey physicians treating allergic patients during the pandemic.

resultsThree hundred and forty-five physicians who regularly offer and perform AIT in German-speaking countries responded to the questions. 70.4% of the respondents stated that they regularly initiated and dosed up SCIT for inhalant allergies (41.4% venom-SCIT, 73.6% SLIT), and 85.2% of the respondents stated that they continued SCIT for inhalant allergies during the maintenance phase in a regular way (59.1% venom-SCIT, 90.4% SLIT) in healthy patients without current symptoms indicating an infection with COVID-19. With regard to tolerability, there was no evidence for increased occurrence of adverse events in patients without current symptoms of COVID-19 infection during the pandemic.

conclusionsThis retrospective study demonstrated adherence to national and international position papers of AIT during the COVID-19 pandemic in German-speaking countries. Besides, the survey has confirmed a good tolerability of AIT for both SCIT and SLIT.

Indexed as

allergen immunotherapyCOVID-19pandemicsafetySARS-CoV-2survey

Identifiers

PMID35344300
PMCPMC8967257
OpenAlexW4220672309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.