Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35344254›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2022

Plane of mesocolic dissection as predictor of recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for sigmoid colon cancer: A cohort study.

Sara Sakjah, Anna Sofie Friis Olsen, Anders Kierkegaard Gundestrup, Pernille Wolder Born, Birgitte Bols, Peter Ingeholm, Jakob Kleif, Claus Anders Bertelsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Standardised Pfannenstiel versus supraumbilical muscle-sparing transverse extraction sites in colon cancer surgery: An IDEAL stage 4 report.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Plane of mesocolic dissection as predictor of recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for sigmoid colon cancer: A cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara SakjahDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.
Anna Sofie Friis OlsenDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.
Anders Kierkegaard GundestrupDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.
Pernille Wolder BornDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.
Birgitte BolsDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Peter IngeholmDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Jakob KleifDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.
Claus Anders BertelsenDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6337-8447
University of Copenhagen · DKGentofte Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate whether intramesocolic plane dissection assessed on fresh specimens by the pathologist is a risk factor for recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for sigmoid cancer when compared with mesocolic plane dissection.

methodSingle-centre study based on prospectively registered data on patients undergoing resection for UICC stage I-III sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma during the period 2010-2017. The patients were stratified into either an intramesocolic plane group or a mesocolic plane group. Primary outcome was risk of recurrence after 4.2 years using inverse probability treatment weighting and competing risk analyses.

resultsOf a total of 332 patients, two were excluded as the specimen was assessed as muscularis propria plane, 237 (72%) specimens were deemed as mesocolic and 93 (28%) as intramesocolic. The 4.2-year cumulative incidence of recurrence after inverse probability treatment weighting was 14.9% (10.4-19.3) in the mesocolic group compared with 9.4% (3.7-15.0) in the intramesocolic group, thus the absolute risk difference between the mesocolic plane and intramesocolic plane was 5.5% (-12.5-1.6; p = 0.13) in favour of the intramesocolic group.

conclusionIntramesocolic plane dissection was not a risk factor for recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for sigmoid cancer when compared with mesocolic plane dissection. No difference in risk of local recurrence, death before recurrence, and in overall survival after 4.2 years was observed between the two groups. With less than 1% of the specimens deemed as muscularis propria plane dissection, the classification appears unusable for the risk prediction of sigmoid colon cancer.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaColonic NeoplasmsLaparoscopyMesocolonSigmoid NeoplasmsCohort StudiesColectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionTreatment Outcomecolon cancermesocolic dissection planerecurrencesigmoid colon

Identifiers

PMID35344254
PMCPMC9543653
OpenAlexW4221077229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.