Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35344155›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2022

Using a Validated Population Pharmacokinetic Model for Dosing Recommendations of Continuous Infusion Piperacillin for Critically Ill Adult Patients.

Ibrahim El-Haffaf, Romain Guilhaumou, Lionel Velly, Amélie Marsot

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. When and How to Use MIC in Clinical Practice?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ibrahim El-HaffafFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Jean-Coutu, 2940 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada. ibrahim.el-haffaf@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7414-227X
Romain GuilhaumouService de Pharmacologie Clinique et Pharmacovigilance, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Inserm UMR 1106, Marseille, France.
Lionel VellyService d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital de la Timone, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille et Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, CNRS, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Amélie MarsotFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Jean-Coutu, 2940 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND 

objectivePiperacillin is a broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic commonly prescribed in intensive care units. Many piperacillin population pharmacokinetic models have been published, but few underwent an external evaluation. External evaluation is an important process to determine a model's capability of being generalized to other hospitals. We aimed to assess the predictive performance of these models with an external validation dataset.

methodsSix models were evaluated with a dataset consisting of 30 critically ill patients (35 samples) receiving piperacillin by continuous infusion. Models were subject to prediction-based (bias and imprecision) and simulation-based evaluations. When a model had an acceptable evaluation, it was used for dosing simulations to evaluate the probability of target attainment.

resultsBias and imprecision ranged from - 35.7 to 295% and from 22.7 to 295%, respectively. The models of Klastrup et al. and of Udy et al. were acceptable according to our criteria and were used for dosing simulations. Simulations showed that a loading dose of 4 g followed by a maintenance dose of 16 g/24 h of piperacillin infused continuously was necessary to remain above a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target set as a minimal inhibitory concentration of 16 mg/L in 90% of patients, for a median patient with a creatinine clearance of 76 mL/min.

conclusionsDespite the considerable variation in the predictive performance of the models with the external validation dataset, this study was able to validate two of these models and led to the elaboration of a dosing nomogram for piperacillin by continuous infusion that can be used by clinicians in intensive care units.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessPiperacillinAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsPiperacillin

Identifiers

PMID35344155
OpenAlexW4220788072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.