ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022
Coarse label refinement for improving prostate cancer detection in ultrasound imaging.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUltrasound-guided biopsy plays a major role in prostate cancer (PCa) detection, yet is limited by a high rate of false negatives and low diagnostic yield of the current systematic, non-targeted approaches. Developing machine learning models for accurately identifying cancerous tissue in ultrasound would help sample tissues from regions with higher cancer likelihood. A plausible approach for this purpose is to use individual ultrasound signals corresponding to a core as inputs and consider the histopathology diagnosis for the entire core as labels. However, this introduces significant amount of label noise to training and degrades the classification performance. Previously, we suggested that histopathology-reported cancer involvement can be a reasonable approximation for the label noise.
methodsHere, we propose an involvement-based label refinement (iLR) method to correct corrupted labels and improve cancer classification. The difference between predicted and true cancer involvements is used to guide the label refinement process. We further incorporate iLR into state-of-the-art methods for learning with noisy labels and predicting cancer involvement.
resultsWe use 258 biopsy cores from 70 patients and demonstrate that our proposed label refinement method improves the performance of multiple noise-tolerant approaches and achieves a balanced accuracy, correlation coefficient, and mean absolute error of 76.7%, 0.68, and 12.4, respectively.
conclusionsOur key contribution is to leverage a data-centric method to deal with noisy labels using histopathology reports, and improve the performance of prostate cancer diagnosis through a hierarchical training process with label refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.