Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35344108›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2022

Fine-tuning of epithelial taste bud organoid to promote functional recapitulation of taste reactivity.

Anish Ashok Adpaikar, Sushan Zhang, Hyun-Yi Kim, Ki Woo Kim, Seok Jun Moon, Jong-Min Lee, Han-Sung Jung

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Organoid models for chemosensing cell studies.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Biomedical applications of organoids derived from the digestive system.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Organoids in the oral and maxillofacial region: present and future.International journal of oral science · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Stem cells for organoids.Smart medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anish Ashok Adpaikar *Division in Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Department of Oral Biology, Taste Research Center, Oral Science Research Center, BK21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, South Korea.
Sushan Zhang *Division in Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Department of Oral Biology, Taste Research Center, Oral Science Research Center, BK21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyun-Yi KimDivision in Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Department of Oral Biology, Taste Research Center, Oral Science Research Center, BK21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, South Korea.
Ki Woo KimDivision of Physiology, Department of Oral Biology, BK21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, South Korea.
Seok Jun MoonDepartment of Oral Biology, BK21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, South Korea.
Jong-Min Lee *Division in Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Department of Oral Biology, Taste Research Center, Oral Science Research Center, BK21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, South Korea. min@yuhs.ac.
Han-Sung Jung *Division in Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Department of Oral Biology, Taste Research Center, Oral Science Research Center, BK21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, South Korea. hsj8076@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2795-531X
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2016R1A5A2008630National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2019R1A2C3005294National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1A2C1005506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taste stem/progenitor cells from posterior mouse tongues have been used to generate taste bud organoids. However, the inaccessible location of taste receptor cells is observed in conventional organoids. In this study, we established a suspension-culture method to fine-tune taste bud organoids by apicobasal polarity alteration to form the accessible localization of taste receptor cells. Compared to conventional Matrigel-embedded organoids, suspension-cultured organoids showed comparable differentiation and renewal rates to those of taste buds in vivo and exhibited functional taste receptor cells and cycling progenitor cells. Accessible taste receptor cells enabled the direct application of calcium imaging to evaluate the taste response. Moreover, suspension-cultured organoids can be genetically altered. Suspension-cultured taste bud organoids harmoniously integrated with the recipient lingual epithelium, maintaining the taste receptor cells and gustatory innervation capacity. We propose that suspension-cultured organoids may provide an efficient model for taste research, including taste bud development, regeneration, and transplantation.

Indexed as

Taste BudsAnimalsEpitheliumMiceOrganoidsTasteTongueApicobasal polarityCalcium imagingGenetic alterationSingle-cell RNA sequencingSuspension-cultureTaste bud organoidsTaste receptor cellsTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID35344108
PMCPMC8958342
OpenAlexW4220974805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.