Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35343808›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2022

Online survey of owners' experiences of medicating their cats at home.

Samantha Taylor, Sarah Caney, Claire Bessant, Danièlle Gunn-Moore

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors Associated with Medication Noncompliance in Dogs in New Zealand.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha TaylorInternational Cat Care, Tisbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8668-0777
Sarah CaneyVet Professionals, Pentlandfield, Roslin, UK.
Claire BessantInternational Cat Care, Tisbury, UK.
Danièlle Gunn-MooreRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, UK.
Canterbury Archaeological Trust · GBRoslin Cells (United Kingdom) · GBRoslin Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to use an online survey to obtain information from cat owners about their experiences of medicating their cats.

methodsAn online survey containing 35 questions on experiences of medicating cats was circulated to cat owners globally.

resultsIn total, 2507 surveys from 57 countries were analysed; 1724 from 'cat owners' and 783 from 'cat owners+' (respondents with significant cat experience, including veterinary professionals). Around half (50.7%) of cat owners were 'sometimes' or 'never' provided with information or advice on how to administer medication; however, 91.8% of those given information found it 'somewhat' or 'very' useful. Around half (53.6%) of owners sought information from the internet about how to administer medication. Total cat owners (cat owners and cat owners+) administered liquids (61.3%), pastes (45.3%) or tablets (39.5%) directly into their cat's mouth; fewer (22.6-24.1%) hid these medications in food. Total cat owners rated tablets significantly harder to administer than liquids; 53.0% chose liquids as their first-choice formulation while 29.3% chose tablets. Insulin injections and 'spot-ons' were significantly easier to administer than any oral medications. Over half (51.6%) of owners reported that medicating their cat(s) had changed their relationship with them; 77.0% reported that their cat(s) had tried to bite or scratch them when medicating. Other challenges included the cat(s) spitting out tablets (78.7%), refusing medication in food (71.7%) and running away (52.7%). Of the owners who failed to complete a course of medication (35.4%), 27.8% stopped near the end of the course, while 19.3% stopped after a few doses, in both cases as medicating was too difficult. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Owners appreciate being provided with information about the administration of medication. Frequent challenges when medicating cats include potential human injury and damage to the owner-cat relationship. Pharmaceutical companies should provide a range of formulations to ease compliance. Veterinary clinics should provide information/demonstrations and internet links when prescribing medications.

Indexed as

AnimalsCatsHumanscommunicationcomplianceliquidsMedicatingownerstablets

Identifiers

PMID35343808
PMCPMC10812359
OpenAlexW4220673090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.