Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35343273›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2023

Efficacy of D-Wave Monitoring Combined With the Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials in High-Risk Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Hideki Shigematsu, Muneharu Ando, Kazuyoshi Kobayashi, Go Yoshida, Masahiro Funaba, Shinji Morito, Masahito Takahashi, Hiroki Ushirozako, Shigenori Kawabata, Kei Yamada and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Hideki ShigematsuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0892-3382
Muneharu AndoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuyoshi KobayashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1533-3476
Go YoshidaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0265-6372
Masahiro FunabaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Shinji MoritoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Masahito TakahashiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki UshirozakoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7722-2205
Shigenori KawabataDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei YamadaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Tsukasa KanchikuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Yasushi FujiwaraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shinichirou TaniguchiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi IwasakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Nobuaki TadokoroDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan.
Kanichiro WadaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Naoya YamamotoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.
Akimasa YasudaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Jun HashimotoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshikazu TaniDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kubokawa Hospital, Kochi, Japan.
Kei AndoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1088-2903
Masaaki MachinoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Tsunenori TakataniDivision of Central Operation, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Yukihiro MatsuyamaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Shiro ImagamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1721-9626
Nagoya University · JPHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPKansai Medical University · JPKurume University · JPNara Medical University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPHirosaki University · JPHiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital · JPJapan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety · JPKyorin University · JPNational Defense Medical College Hospital · JPNishikawa Hospital · JPTokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center · JPUniversity of Kochi · JPWakayama Medical University · JPYamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective multicenter cohort study.

objectivesWe aimed to clarify the efficacy of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), especially in transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials (TES-MEPs) with spinal cord-evoked potentials after transcranial stimulation of the brain (D-wave) in the detection of reversible spinal cord injury in high-risk spinal surgery.

methodsWe reviewed 1310 patients who underwent TES-MEPs during spinal surgery at 14 spine centers. We compared the monitoring results of TES-MEPs with D-wave vs TES-MEPs without D-wave in high-risk spinal surgery.

resultsThere were 40 cases that used TES-MEPs with D-wave and 1270 cases that used TES-MEPs without D-wave. Before patients were matched, there were significant differences between groups in terms of sex and spinal disease category. Although there was no significant difference in the rescue rate between TES-MEPs with D-wave (2.0%) and TES-MEPs (2.5%), the false-positivity rate was significantly lower (0%) in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group. Using a one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis, 40 pairs of patients from the two groups were selected. Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the matched groups. In the score-matched analysis, one case (2.5%) in both groups was a case of rescue (

conclusionsTES-MEPs with D-wave in high-risk spine surgeries did not affect rescue case rates. However, it helped reduce the false-positivity rate.

Indexed as

D-wavefalse positivehigh-risk spine surgeryintraoperative neuromonitoringrescueTES-MEPs

Identifiers

PMID35343273
PMCPMC10538305
OpenAlexW4220730490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.