ArticleCancer medicine2022
Exploration of predictive biomarkers for postoperative recurrence of stage II/III colorectal cancer using genomic sequencing.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Exploration of predictive biomarkers for postoperative recurrence of stage II/III colorectal cancer using genomic sequencing.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a radiogenomics model to predict axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer integrating MRI with transcriptome data: A multicohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative recurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) eventually leads to therapeutic failure; therefore, treatment strategies based on accurate prediction of recurrence are urgently required. To identify biomarkers that can predict treatment outcomes, we compared the mutational profiles of surgically resected specimens from patients with recurrent cancer with those from patients with non-recurrent cancer. Target sequencing, whole-exome sequencing (WES), or whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on 89 and 58 tumors from recurrent and non-recurrent cases, respectively. WGS revealed the driver mutations that were not detected with target sequencing or WES, including the structural variations affecting ZFP36L2. Loss of function of ZFP36L2 was frequently observed in primary tumors from recurrent cases. Furthermore, the recurrence-free survival of patients with loss of function of ZFP36L2 was significantly shorter relative to patients with no loss of ZFP36L2 function. In summary, the study demonstrated that detailed genomic analysis could help improve precision medicine for CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.