ArticleCancer medicine2022
Lung cancer incidence among world trade center rescue and recovery workers.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lung Cancer Incidence After September 11, 2001, Among World Trade Center Responders.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The Association of Air Pollution Exposure With Glucose and Lipid Levels: The Role of an Extreme Air Pollution Event Alongside 2 Decades of Moderate Exposure.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Mutagenicity of the organic fraction of World Trade Center dust.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2023Article
- Lung cancer incidence among world trade center rescue and recovery workers.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany World Trade Center disaster (WTC) rescue and recovery workers (WTC RRWV) were exposed to toxic inhalable particles. The impact of WTC exposures on lung cancer risk is unclear.
methodsData from the WTC Health Program General Responders Cohort (WTCGRC) were linked to health information from a large New York City health system to identify incident lung cancer cases. Incidence rates for lung cancer were then calculated. As a comparison group, we created a microsimulation model that generated expected lung cancer incidence rates for a WTC- and occupationally-unexposed cohort with similar characteristics. We also fitted a Poisson regression model to determine specific lung cancer risk factors for WTC RRWV.
resultsThe incidence of lung cancer for WTC RRWV was 39.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30.7-49.9) per 100,000 person-years. When compared to the simulated unexposed cohort, no significant elevation in incidence was found among WTC RRWV (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.34; 95% CI: 0.92-1.96). Predictors of lung cancer incidence included age, smoking intensity, and years since quitting for former smokers. In adjusted models evaluating airway obstruction and individual pre-WTC occupational exposures, only mineral dust work was associated with lung cancer risk (IRR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.07-3.86). DISCUSSION: In a sample from a large, prospective cohort of WTC RRWV we found a lung cancer incidence rate that was similar to that expected of a WTC- and occupationally-unexposed cohort with similar individual risk profiles. Guideline-concordant lung cancer surveillance and periodic evaluations of population-level lung cancer risk should continue in this group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.