Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35343061›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022

Posterior INFIX for Treating Unilateral Unstable Sacral Fractures.

Haotian Qi, Xin Geng, Xiaokun Yu, Wenhuan Chen, Jian Jia, Wei Tian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haotian QiDepartment of Orthopaedic Trauma, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7269-0341
Xin GengDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiaokun YuDepartment of Radiology, The Fifth Centre Hospital of Tianjin City, Tianjin, China.
Wenhuan ChenThird Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jian JiaDepartment of Orthopaedic Trauma, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wei TianDepartment of Orthopaedic Trauma, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Hospital · CNFifth Tianjin Central Hospital · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

Foundation for Science Technology and Talents of Tianjin Health Commission (RC20203)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the clinical outcomes of the treatment of unilateral unstable sacral fractures by fixation with the posterior INFIX (posterior pelvic ring screw-rod internal fxation).

methodsData of 60 patients with unilateral unstable sacral fractures who underwent surgery from March 2013 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed according to the selection criteria. All patients were associated with anterior pelvic ring injuries, and the operations were performed by the same team of surgeons. According to the different types of internal fixation, the patients were divided into two groups, which both included 30 patients: the posterior INFIX group and iliosacral screw fixation group. The demographic and clinical data of the two patient groups, such as age, sex, sacral fracture types based on the Denis classification, operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative fluoros copy time, Majeed pelvic score at final follow-up, and quality of fracture reduction based on Mears and Velyvis's imaging classification criteria were collected by the same researcher and compared statistically.

resultsAll patients were continuously followed up for 23.17 ± 3.34 months (range, 12 to 46 months). All sacral fractures healed with an average healing time of 9.3 ± 2.24 months (range, 6 to 18 months). None of the patients had re-displacement of the fracture or fixation failure. Compared to the iliosacral screw group, the posterior INFIX group patients had more intraoperative bleeding (t = 3.59, P < 0.001), shorter operation time (t = 4.49, P < 0.001), and shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy time (t = 6.26, P < 0.001). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, fracture type, Majeed score, and quality of fracture reduction (P > 0.05). In the posterior INFIX group, one patient had a superficial wound infection and one patient complained of discomfort due to a prominent fixation. In the iliosacral screw fixation group, one patient had intraoperative iatrogenic S1 nerve injury and vessel injury. The posterior INFIX fixation was a simpler manipulation with higher safety, shorter time of operation and intraoperative fluoroscopy, and similar clinical outcomes compared to iliosacral screw fixation.

conclusionFor the treatment of unilateral unstable sacral fractures, the posterior INFIX fixation can be recommended in clinic application.

Indexed as

Fractures, BonePelvic BonesSpinal FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansRetrospective StudiesSacrumBone fracturesFracture internal fixationMinimally invasive surgical proceduresSacrum

Identifiers

PMID35343061
PMCPMC9002066
OpenAlexW4221111896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.