Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35343053›Full record

ArticleClinical obesity2022

Association of clinically significant weight loss with number of patient visits and months of attendance at an Australian multidisciplinary weight management clinic.

Juliana Chen, Harpreet Kaur, Joanna Jaques, Zoe Rock, Catherine M Dean, Reginald V Lord, Veronica Preda

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical obesity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juliana ChenHealthy Weight Clinic, MQ Health, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2844-6947
Harpreet KaurDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Joanna JaquesHealthy Weight Clinic, MQ Health, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Zoe RockDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Catherine M DeanDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Reginald V LordHealthy Weight Clinic, MQ Health, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Veronica PredaHealthy Weight Clinic, MQ Health, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUThe University of Notre Dame Australia · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARBARA A GOWER · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the obesity epidemic, there are relatively few multidisciplinary obesity services in Australia, and only limited data on the effectiveness of these services. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a university hospital-based weight management clinic-the 'Healthy Weight Clinic' in supporting patients to achieve clinically significant weight loss (≥5% reduction in body weight), weight maintenance, and changes in body composition. A retrospective review was conducted to determine weight and associated health outcomes in patients who attended an initial consultation in the first 2 years of the clinic-between March 2017 and March 2019. Follow up was at least 1 year for all patients. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were excluded. Of 213 total patients, 172 patients attended more than one follow-up consultation for lifestyle modification. Mean weight change and percentage total weight change at last follow-up was -6.2 kg (SD 7.4) and - 6.0% (SD 6.9), respectively. For every additional clinic follow-up, there was 21.4% increased odds of achieving clinically significant weight loss, and for every additional month of follow-up, there was 10.1% increased odds of achieving clinically significant weight loss. Twenty percent of patients (34/172) maintained ≥5% of initial body weight loss for at least 1 year. Body composition measurements were also favourable, with significant changes in percentage skeletal muscle mass of +0.8% (SD 1.5) and in percentage fat mass by -1.4% (SD 3.2). Regular support in a structured holistic multidisciplinary obesity service enables patients to achieve clinically meaningful weight loss and improved skeletal muscle mass to body fat ratio, and maintain this loss for at least 1 year. Improved weight loss was associated with more patient visits and longer duration of attendance at the clinic.

Indexed as

ObesityWeight LossAustraliaBehavior TherapyBody Mass IndexHumansLife Styledieteticsendocrinologyexercise physiologyfollow-upintegrated careinterdisciplinary health teamobesity

Identifiers

PMID35343053
PMCPMC9285583
OpenAlexW4220782481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.