Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35342893›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2022

Concerns about the external validity of the study 'prevalence of persistent symptoms after treatment for Lyme borreliosis: A prospective observational cohort study'-authors´ reply.

Cees C van den Wijngaard, Jeanine Ursinus, Hedwig D Vrijmoeth, Hans Knoop, Albert Wong, Leo A B Joosten, Joppe W Hovius, Bart Jan Kullberg

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation and 1-year follow-up of patients presenting at a Lyme borreliosis expertise centre: a prospective cohort study with validated questionnaires.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cees C van den WijngaardNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Center for Infectious Disease Control, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, the Netherlands.
Jeanine UrsinusDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, Amsterdam, 1100 DD, the Netherlands.
Hedwig D VrijmoethDepartment of Internal Medicine and Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases (RCI), Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, the Netherlands.
Hans KnoopDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. Box 22660, Amsterdam, 1100 DD, the Netherlands.
Albert WongNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Department for Statistics, Informatics and Modeling, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Leo A B JoostenDepartment of Internal Medicine and Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases (RCI), Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, the Netherlands.
Joppe W HoviusDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, Amsterdam, 1100 DD, the Netherlands.
Bart Jan KullbergDepartment of Internal Medicine and Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases (RCI), Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID35342893
PMCPMC8943426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.