Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35342884›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2021

Whole Life: a feasibility study of a recovery-focussed intervention in patients with stabilised schizophrenia.

Tim M Gale, Jan Woodward, Glynis Meredith-Windle, Thanusha Balakumar, Brian Littlechild, Chris J Hawley

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tim M GaleDepartment of Research, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hatfield, AL10 8YE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-6713
Jan WoodwardSchool of Health & Social Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
Glynis Meredith-WindleArcHealth, St Albans, UK.
Thanusha BalakumarDepartment of Research, Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Hatfield, AL10 8YE, UK.
Brian LittlechildSchool of Health & Social Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8346-813X
Chris J HawleySchool of Life & Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
University of Hertfordshire · GBHertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0407-13096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Recovery Approach is about supporting people to live the best life they possibly can. This paper reports on a 2008-11 study of a recovery-focussed, one-to-one coaching programme called Whole Life (WL) in a group of people with stabilised schizophrenia. WL comprises 15 modules, each addressing an aspect of life that may pose challenges for someone with mental illness. It involves regular meetings with a coach, additional homework activities and lasts approximately one-year. This level of commitment requires participants to be motivated and enthusiastic. Methods: This was a non-randomised feasibility study, designed to assess acceptability and potential benefits of WL. The WL group was compared to another group of people with the same diagnosis, who received their usual treatment. This was not a strict control group. The primary outcome measure was the Social Adaptation Self-Assessment Scale. Results: Of those recruited to the WL group, 33/44 (75%) completed the full programme. WL participants showed an 11-point increase in mean SASS between baseline and Week 60. Subjective ratings showed benefits of WL at 3 and 6 months after the intervention had ceased, with most saying they felt better and none saying that they felt worse. The comparison group was more ill than the WL group at baseline and showed some improvement over the course of the study, albeit at a lower level than the WL group. However, controlling for baseline group differences meant that none of the outcome measures could reliably distinguish between WL and comparison groups. Conclusions: The study showed that WL is an acceptable and helpful intervention for motivated and enthusiastic individuals. It may have wider applicability for people with a less serious and chronic mental illness, although we do not know how it compares to other interventions. We discuss some methodological limitations of the study.

Indexed as

Co-productionFeasibilityInterventionMental HealthPsychologicalRecoverySchizophreniaSocial AdaptationWhole-Life

Identifiers

PMID35342884
PMCPMC7612533
OpenAlexW4220895679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.