ArticleKidney medicine2022
Correlation Between 24-Hour Urine Protein and Random Urine Protein-Creatinine Ratio in Amyloid Light-Chain Amyloidosis.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of urine protein/creatinine ratio with 24-hour urine protein in ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Renal Response Criteria for Clinical Trials in Amyloid Light Chain Amyloidosis.Kidney international reports · 2024Review
- Comparison of three spot proteinuria measurements for pediatric nephrotic syndrome: based on the International pediatric Nephrology Association 2022 Guidelines.Renal failure · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Test the feasibility of replacing 24-hour urine collection with a single voided urinary protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR) in patients with amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. Study Design: Retrospective study examining the correlation between a 24-hour urine measurement and UPCR at various proteinuria levels using a linear regression analysis with Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). We assessed how using these 2 different measurements would alter the diagnosis, staging, and kidney response assessment in patients with AL amyloidosis. Setting & Participants: We included 265 patients with systemic AL amyloidosis who visited the Amyloidosis Center at Boston University between July 2018-January 2020 and had proteinuria measurement by both methods on the same day. Tests Compared: 24-hour urine collection for protein versus UPCR. Results: The correlation between 24-hour urine and UPCR was moderate in patients with proteinuria levels of 500-3,000 mg/day and >3,000 mg/day, with r values of 0.57 and 0.62, respectively. Replacing the 24-hour urine collection with UPCR changed kidney staging in 10% of the patients: 77% were reclassified to a worse kidney stage and 23% to a more favorable stage. The majority of changes (85%) in kidney staging occurred in the >3,000 mg/day cohort. There were 35 patients whose kidney response was assessed by concomitant 24-hour urine collection and UPCR with visits at least 6 months apart. Of these patients, 20% had discordance between the 24-hour urine collection and UPCR that changed their definition of organ response. Limitations: Given the rarity of AL amyloidosis, our sample size is small and from a single referral center. Conclusions: Although the 24-hour urine collection is cumbersome, we continue to recommend it in patients with AL amyloidosis because replacing the 24-hour urine collection with UPCR would change kidney staging and organ response in 10%-20% of patients. In addition, the correlation between the 2 modalities was moderate at best in patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.