Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35342867›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on behavior science2022

Monte Carlo Analyses for Single-Case Experimental Designs: An Untapped Resource for Applied Behavioral Researchers and Practitioners.

Jonathan E Friedel, Alison Cox, Ann Galizio, Melissa Swisher, Megan L Small, Sofia Perez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on behavior science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan E FriedelDepartment of Psychology, Georgia Southern University, 2670 Southern Drive, Statesboro, GA 30460-8041 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1516-330X
Alison CoxBrock University, St. Catharines, ON Canada.
Ann GalizioMiddle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN USA.
Melissa SwisherPurdue University, Lafayette, IN USA.
Megan L SmallDepartment of Psychology, Georgia Southern University, 2670 Southern Drive, Statesboro, GA 30460-8041 USA.
Sofia PerezDepartment of Psychology, Georgia Southern University, 2670 Southern Drive, Statesboro, GA 30460-8041 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group-based experimental designs are an outgrowth of the logic of null-hypothesis significance testing and thus, statistical tests are often considered inappropriate for single-case experimental designs. Behavior analysts have recently been more supportive of efforts to include appropriate statistical analysis techniques to evaluate single-case experimental design data. One way that behavior analysts can incorporate statistical analyses into their practices with single-case experimental designs is to use Monte Carlo analyses. These analyses compare experimentally obtained behavioral data to simulated samples of behavioral data to determine the likelihood that the experimentally obtained results occurred due to chance (i.e., a

Indexed as

Monte CarloShinySingle-case experimental designsstatistical analysisVisual analysis

Identifiers

PMID35342867
PMCPMC8894529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.